Tinubu Should Return to Primary, Secondary School, Sowore Says
By Sabiu Abdulahi
African Action Congress (AAC) presidential candidate, Omoyele Sowore, has urged President Bola Tinubu to enrol in adult education. He said the president should return to primary and secondary school despite his age.
Sowore spoke on Monday after proceedings in his defamation case involving President Tinubu at the Federal High Court in Abuja.
The activist criticised Tinubu over the educational information submitted to the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC). He argued that the president did not include details of his primary and secondary education in the documents filed for the 2027 presidential election.
Records submitted to INEC for the election reportedly contained Tinubu’s Chicago State University certificate. However, they did not list his primary and secondary school qualifications in the section for educational history.
Speaking after the court session, Sowore said, “President Tinubu didn’t go to primary and secondary school. He only presented a paper from Chicago State University, which was different from the paper he presented in 1999.
“I’m advising him that it’s not too late to take advantage of adult education. Let him go back to primary school online,” Sowore said.
Kano Govt Urges Beneficiaries Not to Sell Allocated Plots
By Uzair Adam
The Kano State Government has urged beneficiaries of its land allocation programme not to sell their plots, saying the allocations are intended to provide long-term security and wealth for families rather than short-term financial gain.
The call was made on Sunday during the presentation of land allocation documents to polling agents in Kano under the administration of Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf.
Governor Yusuf, in a speech delivered by the Commissioner for Public Procurement, Projects Monitoring and Evaluation, Nura Ma’aji Sumaila, said the land allocation programme was part of a broader policy to expand home ownership across the state.
He said the initiative would gradually be extended to more segments of society, including young people, women, civil servants, community leaders and other hardworking citizens, as part of efforts to reduce the housing deficit and improve family security.
The governor noted that beneficiaries had received plots in professionally planned government layouts equipped with road networks, drainage systems, schools, healthcare facilities, markets, places of worship, parks and other public infrastructure.
According to him, proper urban planning would make it easier for government to provide essential services while increasing the long-term value of the properties.
The Commissioner for Land and Physical Planning, Abduljabbar Muhammad Umar, urged beneficiaries not to dispose of their plots because of short-term financial needs.
“Please do not sell your land allocation because of short-term financial needs. Instead, develop it, build your home and create a lasting asset for your family,” Umar said.
He explained that the allocated plots were located within government-approved layouts designed to create organised, safe and sustainable communities where families could live, invest and prosper.
Umar contrasted the layouts with illegal land developments, popularly known as Awon Igiya, which he said had contributed to unplanned settlements, flooding, traffic congestion, insecurity, land disputes and slum conditions across parts of the state.
He said the government remained committed to ending illegal land development and restoring order to land administration across Kano State.
The Daily Reality recalls that the Kano State Government on Saturday commenced the distribution of land allocation documents to political appointees, including Senior Special Assistants, Senior Special Reporters, Special Assistants, Special Reporters and Personal Assistants.
The government said the exercise, which concluded on Sunday with the presentation to polling agents, was expected to benefit about 2,500 beneficiaries as part of its broader effort to expand home ownership and reduce the state’s housing deficit.
How Nigerian Deaf Student Experienced Real Inclusion at University of Cape Town
By Myolisi Gophe
When meningitis robbed him of his hearing at the age of eight, many believed Ibrahim Tukur’s future had been written off. His teachers could no longer reach him. Friends drifted away. Some mocked him. Even his father, convinced there was no future for a deaf child, withdrew him from school.
Today, that same boy is pursuing a Master of Philosophy (MPhil) in Disability Studies at the University of Cape Town’s (UCT) Department of Rehabilitation and Health Sciences as the first Deaf Mandela Rhodes Scholar – one of Africa’s most prestigious leadership scholarships – and is using his experiences to advocate for a more inclusive society.
For Tukur, who hails from Nigeria, his journey is not simply one of overcoming adversity – it is proof that when barriers are removed and opportunities are created, people with disabilities can thrive.
“Receiving the scholarship was one of the happiest moments of my life,” he said. “It reminded me that our disabilities do not determine our success.”
Growing up in Ingawa, a small town in Nigeria’s Katsina State, life changed overnight when meningitis left him Deaf.
Unable to follow lessons in mainstream classrooms, he experienced a sharp decline in academic performance.
“My life drastically changed,” he recalled. “I could no longer understand what my teachers were teaching.”
The social isolation that followed was equally devastating.
“I lost most of my friends, who avoided me because of my deafness, as if it were a curse.”
Believing there was little hope for his son’s future, his father removed him from school.
But fate intervened.
A relative encouraged his father to enrol him at the Government School for the Deaf in Malumfashi, a residential school where sign language was the primary means of communication.
The impact was immediate.
“For the first time since losing my hearing, I learned in an environment where everyone communicated through sign language. Gradually, I regained my confidence, rediscovered my love for learning, and began to believe in myself again.”
That experience sparked a lifelong commitment to ensuring other Deaf children would not face the same barriers.
He went on to earn a degree in Special Education from Bayero University in Kano before enrolling at UCT to deepen his understanding of disability inclusion and advocacy.
Today, he serves as the head teacher at Dambo Tukur School for the Deaf and he also co-founded the Thrive Disability Initiative, a non-governmental organisation (NGO) dedicated to empowering persons with disabilities through education, employment, and entrepreneurship.
Finding inclusion at UCT
Although he had spent years advocating for disability rights, arriving at UCT introduced him to a level of inclusion he had never previously experienced.
“I have never experienced what real inclusion was like until I came to UCT,” he said.
When he struggled to find accommodation upon arrival, staff at UCT’s Disability Service stepped in immediately, helping secure accessible accommodation at Obz Square in Observatory and installing assistive technologies in his room.
Initially, he worried he might be inconveniencing others.
“I realised that inclusion is not about doing someone a favour. It is about removing barriers so everyone can participate equally.”
Another turning point came when his South African Sign Language interpreter connected him with members of the Western Cape Deaf community.
“Through them, I found friendship, belonging and a sense of home.”
Those experiences reinforced his belief that leadership begins by creating spaces where everyone feels seen, valued and included.
The importance of leadership
The Mandela Rhodes Scholarship recognises more than academic excellence. It seeks young leaders committed to reconciliation, entrepreneurship and social impact.
For him, leadership has always been measured by how many lives are impacted, rather than what titles people have.
Among his proudest achievements is advocating for the establishment of Dambo Tukur School for the Deaf back home, which now provides quality education to more than 50 Deaf children who previously had little or no access to schooling.
He has also organised mentorship programmes for Deaf learners, trained government workers in sign language to improve communication with Deaf citizens and coordinated vocational skills programmes that have enabled many unemployed Deaf adults to become financially independent.
One of his biggest challenges came while campaigning for the school.
Government officials initially resisted the proposal because of misconceptions about Deaf people.
Rather than allowing disagreement to create division, he chose dialogue.
“By continuing to engage respectfully and demonstrating the importance of inclusive education, we eventually secured approval and established the school.”
He believes those experiences embody the leadership values championed by the Mandela Rhodes Foundation.
Overcoming invisible barriers
His own university experience also revealed the everyday obstacles Deaf students continue to face.
As an undergraduate, before his journey with UCT, he completed his degree without the support of a sign language interpreter.
Instead, he relied on lecture notes, handouts, and hours of independent study to compensate for the information he could not access in class.
“There were moments when I questioned whether I truly belonged at university and whether I could succeed in a system that was not designed with Deaf students in mind.”
Despite those challenges, he graduated with an Upper Second Class pass (an average score between 60% and 69% across his university courses).
The experience shaped his conviction that disability itself is not the greatest obstacle.
“Inaccessible environments create the greatest barriers to success.”
As someone who has lived the realities of exclusion, he believes universities have an important role to play in changing society.
He would like to see disability studies integrated across disciplines so that graduates in every field understand disability rights, accessibility, and inclusive communication.
He also advocates for stronger support services, including timely access to sign language interpreters, assistive technologies and accessible learning materials.
Financial support for students with disabilities, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds, is equally important.
Long-term vision
His long-term vision is ambitious: over the next decade, he hopes to empower at least 500 people with disabilities through education, leadership development and entrepreneurship.
The Mandela Rhodes Scholarship, he said, provides more than financial support.
“It gives me the knowledge, networks and leadership experience to achieve these goals.”
Looking back on his journey, he hopes his story inspires other Deaf learners to believe in themselves.
“Do not allow society’s expectations to define your future,” he said.
“There will be obstacles, and there may be moments when people underestimate your abilities, but your deafness does not determine your intelligence, your talent or your potential.”
His message is simple but powerful.
“If a boy who was once withdrawn from school because people believed he had no future could become a Mandela Rhodes Scholar and study at one of Africa’s leading universities, then you should never doubt what is possible for your own life.
“Dream boldly, persevere through challenges, and remember that you deserve to learn, to lead and thrive just like everyone else.”
Editor’s Note: The article was first published on the Cape Town University news website here: How a Deaf student experienced real inclusion at UCT.
Opposition Leader’s Criticisms Are Based On Outdated Data, Misrepresentations—Presidency
By Abdullahi Mukhtar Algasgaini
The Presidency has fired back at former Vice President Atiku Abubakar, dismissing his recent criticism of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s economic policies as “pedestrianism” and arguing that the opposition leader’s concerns are rooted in outdated data from 2024 rather than Nigeria’s current economic reality.
In a detailed statement issued Saturday by presidential spokesperson Bayo Onanuga, the administration provided a point-by-point rebuttal to Atiku’s allegations of “fiscal recklessness,” defending its record on borrowing, subsidy removal, tax reforms, and overall economic management.
The statement took particular issue with Atiku’s reliance on 2024 data, arguing that Nigeria’s economy has evolved considerably since the painful adjustments of that year.
“Judging a reform programme solely by its earliest and most painful phase is like judging chemotherapy by the nausea it induces while ignoring the remission it seeks to achieve,” Onanuga wrote.
According to the Presidency, Nigeria’s dollar-denominated GDP has recovered from approximately $253 billion following the 2024 exchange-rate reset to about $377 billion – a 49 per cent increase. Naira GDP has expanded from about ₦314 trillion in 2024 to around ₦530 trillion, a 69 per cent increase.
On the question of Nigeria’s borrowing, the administration argued that the country’s debt-to-GDP ratio remains modest at barely 40 per cent compared to peer economies, including South Africa (85 per cent), Egypt (80 per cent), and Kenya (75 per cent).
The statement highlighted what it called a “remarkable achievement” in reducing the debt service-to-revenue ratio from nearly 100 per cent in December 2022 to less than 60 per cent today.
“Nigerians suffered over the years as a vast proportion of our resources were deployed to pay fuel-subsidy merchants,” the statement said, noting that the Obasanjo-Atiku administration “never did the needful” on the subsidy issue.
The Presidency defended the removal of fuel subsidies, pointing to improved revenues accruing to states and local governments through the Federation Account.
“President Tinubu has tactically placed more responsibility for socioeconomic development on states and local governments, while providing requisite funding. This is true federalism,” Onanuga stated.
The administration rejected Atiku’s suggestion that the government has chosen to tax Nigerians more, describing the claim as “blatantly false.”
The statement explained that the tax reforms aim to reduce burdens on low-income earners earning N1 million and below annually, and small businesses with turnover of N100 million and below, while strengthening compliance among higher-income individuals and profitable enterprises.
The statement outlined several achievements in health, education, and infrastructure over the past three years:
· Over 100 facilities providing free caesarean operations for indigent mothers
· Three world-class cancer centres operational in Kubwa, Enugu, and Katsina
· Over 3,000 Primary Healthcare Centres revitalised
· More than 11,000 projects through the Universal Basic Education Commission
· Over 1.64 million students benefiting from NELFUND loans totalling N303 billion
· End to university lecturers’ strikes
The Presidency dismissed Atiku’s claim of an N7.98 trillion oil windfall, arguing that such calculations ignore production costs, crude sharing arrangements, and forward contracts.
“Incremental revenue from higher oil prices is reflected in monthly FAAC figures,” the statement noted, adding that average daily production of 1.6 million barrels per day has fallen short of the 1.84 million bpd forecast.
The statement concluded on an optimistic note, projecting that inflation, which fell to 14.4 per cent in November 2025 before rising to 15.91 per cent due to Middle East conflicts, will trend towards 12 per cent by year-end.
“Nigeria’s economy is not yet where it aspires to be. But neither is it where it stood at the height of its structural distortions or in the bygone years of fiscal waste and slackness,” Onanuga wrote. “The worst is over.”
The administration also highlighted new ward-centric programmes worth more than $3 billion aimed at strengthening primary healthcare, basic education, and supporting vulnerable communities, in addition to cash transfers to 15 million vulnerable households.
Iran Dismisses Trump’s Claim, Says It Never Asked US To Halt Strikes
By Sabiu Abdullahi
Iran has dismissed United States President Donald Trump’s claim that Tehran asked Washington to refrain from launching fresh military strikes, describing the allegation as false.
According to Iran’s Mehr News Agency, which cited military officials, Trump’s statement “was nothing but a new lie.” The officials also said the country’s armed forces were “on high alert and ready for any eventuality.”
Trump had stated on Saturday that the United States was “ready to go against the Islamic Republic.” He also claimed that Iran and other Middle Eastern countries had urged him not to carry out additional attacks. He added that he agreed to delay any fresh military action on the condition that a deal could be reached with Tehran.
In a post on his Truth Social platform, Trump wrote, “This would include the Immediate, Complete and Total OPENING OF THE HORMUZ STRAIT, and an end to Iran’s nuclear threat.”
Meanwhile, Iran’s Fars News Agency quoted a source close to the country’s negotiating team as saying “as long as the United States maintains its hostile actions, the Strait of Hormuz will remain closed.”
Iran has maintained restrictions in the Strait of Hormuz since the conflict began. Ships are now required to obtain permission and pay transit fees before passing through the strategic waterway.
Rarara vs Pantami: Criticism Is Not an Attack on a Faith
By Muhammad Abubakar
Since I came to France for work, I have been extremely cautious about criticising Israel or Benjamin Netanyahu. Often, though wrongly, people conflate criticism of an entity or a person with criticism of an idea or of an entire ethnic or religious group.
Soon after Hamas’s attack on Israel on October 7, I felt driven to write about the unresolved conflict. It was difficult to ignore the subject. Yet I was also concerned that expressing my views might affect my employment or even my residency status in France. To be certain, I reached out to our Human Resources department for guidance.
We essentially agreed on an important distinction. Israel and Benjamin Netanyahu are not the same as the Jewish people or Judaism. One can criticise the policies of the Israeli government or the actions of its prime minister without expressing hostility towards Jews or the Jewish faith. The same principle applies elsewhere. A person may criticise Saudi Arabia or Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman without being an Islamophobe or an enemy of Islam.
This distinction is fundamental in any society that values free expression and intellectual honesty. Democracies depend on the ability of citizens to question governments, leaders and public figures. If every criticism of a political leader is interpreted as an attack on an entire religion or ethnic group, meaningful public debate becomes impossible.
I was reminded of this principle after listening to new songs released yesterday by the Nigerian political singer, Dauda Kahutu, popularly known as Rarara. The songs appear to criticise an opposition politician in Gombe State, Sheikh Ali Isa Ibrahim Pantami, who is also a respected Islamic scholar.
Unfortunately, I have seen some people make the same mistake that often appears in discussions about international politics. They have framed criticism of Pantami as though it were criticism of Islam itself.
Pantami does not represent Islam. He is a Muslim and an influential public figure, but he remains an individual whose political choices, public statements and actions are open to public scrutiny, just like those of any other politician. Defending him is entirely legitimate, but such a defence should be based on facts, evidence and reason rather than on the assumption that any criticism directed at him is an attack on the religion he professes.
By any definition, both the singer and the governorship candidate he appears to criticise in his songs are Muslims. Neither of them represents Islam. Their political disagreements should therefore remain political disagreements. Turning them into religious disputes serves neither truth nor the public interest.
This tendency to wrap political figures in the cloak of religion is dangerous. It discourages accountability and deepens unnecessary divisions within society. Once religion becomes a shield against legitimate criticism, it becomes difficult to separate public responsibility from personal belief.
Nigeria’s diversity demands greater care in the language we use. Political competition should not be transformed into religious confrontation. Citizens should be able to disagree with politicians, governors, ministers or scholars without being accused of attacking an entire faith.
The lesson is simple. We must distinguish between people and the principles they claim to represent, between governments and the nations they govern, and between political leaders and the religions they practise. Failing to make these distinctions only fuels misunderstanding and polarisation.
Criticise ideas. Debate policies. Defend people if you wish. But let us avoid presenting political disagreements as battles for religion. In the long run, both politics and religion are better served when we keep that distinction clear.
Malam Yayi Rawa and the New Politics of Praise Singing
By Ibrahim Aliyu Gurin
In Northern Nigeria’s political battlegrounds, the loudest attacks don’t always come from campaign podiums. Long before Facebook, TikTok and WhatsApp turned everyone into a publisher, Hausaland already had its own version of political messaging.
The maroƙi (praise-singer) was more than a singer. He was a storyteller, historian and public commentator. When a leader did well, he sang yabo, verses filled with praise and the same performer could just as easily turn that skill toward humiliation by mocking a rival’s failures, appearance, or character in verses crafted to stick in public memory, which is referred to as zambo.
Zambo is a sharp, witty poetry designed to mock, embarrass or expose. It wasn’t always pleasant, but it was part of the culture; the difference today is that zambo has become a political business.
Instead of entertaining a local crowd, one song can now reach millions of people before sunset. A chorus recorded in Kano can be playing in Kaduna, Sokoto, Abuja and even among Hausa communities abroad within hours.
No one illustrates this better than Dauda Kahutu Rarara. Over the years, he has released songs like Hannun Karɓa, Masu Gudu Su Gudu, Baba Buhari Dodar, Jagaba Shi Ne Gaba and recently Malam Ya Yi Rawa. To his supporters, these are campaign anthems. To his critics, they are political attacks wrapped in catchy melodies. Whatever side you take, one thing is difficult to deny: people remember the songs long after they have forgotten the campaign speeches, and this alone says something about the power of music.
What makes today’s political songs different from the poetry of men like Sa’adu Zungur, Mudi Sipikin or Garba Affa is intention. Earlier political poetry was designed to awaken society, challenge injustice and educate the people. Much of today’s political music is driven by patronage. A politician hires a musician, the musician praises one side, ridicules the other, and the song becomes another campaign strategy.
Perhaps that is why political music now feels less like public service and more like political advertising. There is nothing wrong with musicians supporting politicians. Every artist has the right to hold political views. The concern begins when entertainment replaces truth, becomes more influential than verified facts, and insults travel farther than ideas.
Maybe the bigger question is not why politicians pay musicians. Maybe it is why we, the listeners, remember the insults more easily than the policies.
As another election season approaches, perhaps the challenge is to enjoy the music without allowing the chorus to become our ballot paper. After all, a hit song lasts only a few minutes, but the consequences of the leaders we choose can last for years.
Ibrahim Aliyu Gurin is a graduate of mass communication from Bayero University, Kano, and can be reached at ibrahimaliyu5023@gmail.com.
Fagge Community Hails Tinubu Over Dr Salisu’s Appointment As FCAPT Provost
By Uzair Adam
Members of the Fagge Local Government Area in Kano State have welcomed the appointment of Dr. Salisu Salisu as Provost of the Federal College of Agricultural Produce and Technology (FCAPT), describing the development as a well-deserved recognition of his academic excellence, professional competence and years of dedicated service.
The community members also commended President Bola Ahmed Tinubu for approving the appointment, expressing confidence that Dr. Salisu’s wealth of experience would contribute to the growth and development of the institution.
The Daily Reality reports that Dr. Salisu is a senior academic in the Department of Science Laboratory Technology with expertise in Analytical Chemistry, Environmental Toxicology and agricultural research.
He obtained his PhD in Analytical and Environmental Chemistry from Benue State University during the 2023/2024 academic session after earning a Master’s degree in Analytical Chemistry from Bayero University Kano.
He has also authored several scholarly publications on heavy metals, food safety and spectroscopic analysis.
Reacting to the appointment, Aisar Fagge, a lecturer in the Department of Mass Communication at Kano State Polytechnic, described it as a testament to Dr. Fagge’s resilience, dedication and commitment to the institution.
“As one of the old comrades of the school, this appointment is a testimony to his resilience, dedication, commitment and cordial relationship with the staff and the management,” he said.
Aisar expressed optimism that Dr. Salisu’s wealth of experience would help move the institution to greater heights.
He also prayed that Allah would grant the new provost wisdom and guidance in the discharge of his responsibilities while appreciating everyone who contributed to making the appointment possible.
Also speaking, another community member, Hussaini Ibrahim Kote, congratulated the new provost and thanked President Tinubu for what he described as appointing the right person for the job.
The community members prayed for Allah to grant Dr. Salisu success in his new assignment and guide him in steering the Federal College of Agricultural Produce and Technology to greater achievements.
Iran Accuses US of Mixed Signals Over Military Threats, Nuclear Talks
By Sabiu Abdullahi
Senior Iranian officials have accused the United States of issuing public military threats while privately seeking negotiations, amid heightened tensions between the two countries.
Hassan Ghashghavi, a senior Iranian lawmaker and spokesman for the Parliament’s Commission on National Security and Foreign Policy, said Tehran would retain control over traffic through the Strait of Hormuz regardless of developments in the conflict. His remarks came before US President Donald Trump reportedly cancelled planned military strikes.
“In the media, they speak of escalation, while through existing channels they demand negotiations,” Ghashghavi said. “They cannot deceive the Islamic Republic of Iran. Whether by escalating or by negotiating, Iranian arrangement for passage through the SoH [Strait of Hormuz] is the only option on the table.”
The Strait of Hormuz remains one of the world’s most strategic maritime routes because a significant share of global oil shipments passes through it.
Meanwhile, Majidreza Hariri, President of the Iran-China Chamber of Commerce and Industry, argued that Washington would not risk attacking Iran’s energy infrastructure.
“They don’t have the courage to carry it out because Iran’s resilience is far greater than that of the countries in the region against the destruction of infrastructure,” Hariri said in a post on X.
Reports indicate that Iran operates one of the world’s most decentralised electricity networks, with about 150 power plants spread across the country. Analysts say the wide distribution of the facilities makes it more difficult for an aerial attack to trigger a nationwide power outage.
Trump Cancels Planned Iran Strikes, Says Deal Is Within Reach
By Sabiu Abdullahi
US President Donald Trump has announced that he has cancelled planned military strikes against Iran, saying the decision depends on the swift conclusion of an agreement.
In a statement, Trump said he called off the attacks “subject to being able to rapidly make a deal”.
He also claimed that Iran and other Middle Eastern countries had urged him to suspend the planned operation because “the perimeters of a deal has been agreed to”, including the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz.
Trump’s announcement followed fresh warnings from Iran over the possibility of military action.
Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told the foreign ministers of Turkiye, Pakistan and Saudi Arabia in separate telephone conversations that any “aggression” by the United States and Israel would be met with a “decisive and proportionate response”.
Meanwhile, the conflict in Gaza continued as Israeli forces reportedly killed at least eight Palestinians across the territory.
Reports also said Israeli attacks destroyed a medical warehouse in Deir el-Balah. The strike left a crater measuring about 20 metres (66 feet) wide and 10 metres (33 feet) deep.








