ADC

By Sabiu Abdullahi

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has cautioned the African Democratic Congress (ADC) against proceeding with its planned congress and convention in violation of a subsisting court order.

The commission warned that any action taken in disregard of the court directive could attract serious legal consequences, including possible disqualification from future elections.

INEC Chairman, Professor Joash Amupitan (SAN), made this known during an interview on Arise News on Friday. He stated that the commission is already involved in the legal dispute affecting the party, as it has been joined as a defendant in the case.

“As far as we are concerned, INEC is a party in the case and INEC was sued as a defendant by a member of the ADC.

“Secondly, the court is very clear that parties, including David Mark himself, should refrain from doing anything that will fuel the situation of inter-complaints in the court.”

He stressed that the party must consider the implications of its decision in relation to the existing court ruling.

“If they are going ahead with their congress, with their convention, it is left for them to look at it, whether it is in contravention of the Court of Appeal.

“INEC did not just take a decision. We didn’t just wake up one day and take the decision. There was something that led to it.

“There was an order of court not to do anything or take any step that would render any proceeding in court negatory, and also put the trial court in a situation of helplessness of inter-complainants.”

Amupitan explained that the matter of the congress and convention is already before the court. He warned that taking steps before the court reaches a decision could affect the judicial process.

“So, if already they asked not to do any congress and convention, it is a relief that is being claimed, essentially the file in motion for that purpose which has not been determined,” he said.

He also referred to past cases in Zamfara and Plateau states, where political parties suffered setbacks after failing to obey court orders.

“If they decide to go ahead with their congress and convention, let me tell you what happened in Zamfara,” he said.

“It has happened in the past, and we don’t want to conduct an election without this early warning, and at the end of the day, after you have won, the court will again declare your election invalid.

“The implication is that the person with the second highest number of votes will be declared a winner. It happened in Plateau State during the last election where the question of primaries was an issue.

“Congresses were not held in some parts of Plateau state. The court said, go and do those primaries.

“Unfortunately, they did not obey the court order. Failure to obey the court order has consequences.”

The INEC chairman added that while the ADC is free to make its own decisions, the commission will not take any step that could violate a court order or interfere with the case.

“They are at liberty to do whatever they want to do but INEC will not want to go into a situation where there is an order of don’t do anything, don’t take any step,” he said.

“The judgment is very definite. If I proceed to monitor their convention, it means I’m taking steps that will affect the subject matter pending before the court.”

Earlier in the week, INEC announced that it had suspended recognition of the faction of the ADC led by former Senate President, Senator David Mark, based on a court ruling. The commission also removed the names of the party’s leaders from its portal and replaced them with the note, “By court order.”

In response, the ADC called for the immediate resignation of the INEC chairman. The party accused the commission of bias and alleged that it was undermining Nigeria’s democracy ahead of the 2027 general elections.

Speaking in Abuja, Senator David Mark criticised the decision to withdraw recognition from the party’s leadership. He said the ADC no longer has confidence in the commission.

He insisted that the party would continue its internal activities in line with the law. He also called on the international community to monitor developments within Nigeria’s electoral system, warning that recent actions by INEC could threaten democratic stability.

By Sabiu Abdullahi

The Presidency has rejected calls from the African Democratic Congress (ADC) leaders for the resignation of the Chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), Joash Amupitan.

Senior Special Assistant to President Bola Tinubu on Media and Publicity, Temitope Ajayi, said ADC chieftains, including Interim National Chairman David Mark, National Secretary Rauf Aregbesola, and spokesman Bolaji Abdullahi, cannot instruct Amupitan on his duties.

This statement follows a press conference held by ADC leaders in Abuja on Wednesday, where they urged President Tinubu to remove Amupitan, alleging he is incapable of conducting credible elections in Nigeria.

Ajayi, responding on X, said, “We all can at least agree that the INEC chairman is at the top of his career academically and professionally – a teacher of law, Professor of law and a Senior Advocate of Nigeria.

“What this means is he sure knows what ‘status quo ante bellum’ means. Senator David Mark, Mr. Peter Obi, Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola and Mr. Bolaji Abdullahi, certainly, can’t teach him what that Latin legal maxim means.

“It is bad politics for ADC people to make their own internal crisis of choice a problem of Professor Amupitan, that of President Tinubu and APC.”

The Presidency’s response underscores its position that Amupitan’s professional qualifications and experience place him beyond political pressures from opposition party disputes.

By Sabiu Abdullahi

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) has demanded the immediate removal of Joash Amupitan, chairman of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), accusing him of deliberately misinterpreting a court order related to the party’s leadership dispute.

Speaking at a press briefing on Thursday, David Mark, national chairman of the ADC, said the electoral body “can no longer be trusted,” describing its actions as unlawful and partisan.

Mark explained that the controversy arose after a March 12 Court of Appeal judgment directed all parties, including INEC, to maintain the status quo while the case continued in the Federal High Court.

He added that his legal team challenged the Federal High Court’s jurisdiction, but the appeal was dismissed, leaving the directive to preserve the existing ADC leadership intact.

“After the judgment, lawyers associated with Nafiu Bala sought recognition from INEC in a manner that distorts the meaning of status quo ante bellum,” Mark said, claiming that these actions were supported by the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), which he accused of attempting to weaken opposition parties.

“It is not the ADC that is under attack. This is a direct assault on Nigeria’s democracy and the right of Nigerians to choose, participate, and exercise their rights as free citizens,” he added.

Mark further said, “We have witnessed how the APC-led Federal Government has undermined, compromised, and coerced other opposition political parties. The ADC has risen as the last bastion between Nigeria’s democracy and full-blown dictatorship. And this is what worries them.”

He expressed shock at INEC’s April 1 announcement withdrawing recognition for both his leadership and Bala’s faction, creating what he described as a “false equivalence” between the parties.

Mark insisted that Bala had already resigned from party leadership and could not be legally recognised as a factional leader.

“The crux of the matter is the interpretation of status quo ante bellum. There is no legal precedent that supports INEC’s conclusion,” he said, criticizing the commission for failing to seek judicial clarification and accusing it of bias.

He added that INEC has effectively left the ADC without a recognised leadership, noting that the commission “lacks the constitutional authority to determine or impose leadership on political parties.”

“At no time was the ADC without a duly constituted leadership. INEC has invented a status quo that never existed,” Mark said.

“The commission cannot decide who leads a political party. That power does not belong to INEC.”

He concluded that the electoral body’s actions amount to contempt of court and undermine the rule of law. “There is only one conclusion: the electoral umpire has taken sides. It can no longer be trusted,” Mark said.

By Sabiu Abdullahi

Former presidential candidate of the Labour Party, Peter Obi, has faulted the administration of President Bola Tinubu over the crisis rocking the African Democratic Congress (ADC), describing the situation as a setback for democratic values.

Obi made his position known in a post shared on X on Thursday. He expressed concern over what he described as a contradiction involving individuals who once championed democracy and human rights during the era of General Sani Abacha.

He stated that many of those figures, who were active under the National Democratic Coalition (NADECO), now appear to act in ways that contradict the ideals they once promoted. He added that recent developments suggest a decline in respect for democratic principles.

He wrote: “Yesterday defenders of democracy, today’s destroyers. What a shame.

“What an irony of history, that the acclaimed defenders of democracy and human rights who claimed to have fought for democracy during the era of General Sani Abacha now find themselves worse than the man they opposed.

“today, General Sani Abacha, once presumed face of oppression, will be remembered as seemingly more democratic and more respectful of human rights than the so-called champions of activism from the NADECO days. Power indeed reveals character.”

Obi’s remarks followed the decision of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to delete the names of former Senate President David Mark and former Osun State governor Rauf Aregbesola from its portal as national chairman and national secretary of the ADC.

INEC also stated that it would not recognise Nafiu Bala Gombe, who is pursuing recognition as national chairman through the courts.

The commission further announced that it has suspended recognition of all factions within the party. It added that it would not monitor any congresses or conventions organised by the rival groups until the Federal High Court delivers a final judgment on the matter.

By Sabiu Abdullahi

The All Progressives Congress (APC) has expressed support for the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) over its decision to withdraw recognition from the rival factions of the African Democratic Congress (ADC).

INEC had earlier stated that it would no longer recognise or relate with the two opposing groups within the ADC led by former Senate President David Mark and Nafiu Bala Gombe. The commission explained that its action followed a review of a recent Court of Appeal judgment. It added that it would maintain the status quo until the Federal High Court gives a final ruling on the matter.

As part of the decision, INEC also removed the names of executives loyal to Mark from its official portal. The move sparked criticism from members of that faction.

Reacting to the development, APC spokesperson Felix Morka said the crisis within the ADC was caused by the party’s internal actions. He dismissed claims that the ruling party played any role in the situation.

“INEC decision to de-recognise the David Mark executive was utterly self-inflicted. APC didn’t do that. You orchestrate the hijack of the ADC by that executive. We didn’t. They did,” Morka said.

He also accused the Mark-led group of failing to follow due process in taking control of the party.

“You come in with your parachutes; you take over the party without reference to the constitutional stipulation about succession and how leadership is ordered in that party. This is the consequence,” he added.

However, the ADC faction loyal to Mark has rejected INEC’s stance. The group alleged that the electoral body acted under external influence in taking the decision.

By Abdullahi Mukhtar Algasgaini

The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) has officially removed the National Working Committee (NWC) of the African Democratic Congress (ADC) led by David Mark from its official portal, following a detailed review of a recent Court of Appeal ruling.

The Commission disclosed that its decision, reached at a meeting on March 31, 2026, was necessitated by conflicting legal communications from two factions within the party—one supporting Nafiu Bala Gombe and the other backing the Mark-led leadership.

According to INEC, the crisis stems from the resignation of the ADC’s former leadership in July 2025, which led to the emergence of a new executive committee under Mark. Gombe, a former vice-national chairman, has challenged this development, insisting on his right to assume leadership based on the party’s constitution.

In a ruling delivered on March 12, 2026, the Court of Appeal dismissed an interlocutory appeal filed by Mark and ordered all parties to maintain the status quo ante bellum pending the determination of a substantive suit before the Federal High Court in Abuja. The appellate court also directed an accelerated hearing of the case.

INEC stated that in strict compliance with the court’s directive, it declined to recognize Gombe as acting national chairman and suspended all dealings with any faction of the party, including monitoring meetings, congresses, or conventions, until the legal dispute is resolved.

The Commission noted that the removal of the Mark-led NWC from its portal was necessary to preserve the status quo, as the leadership had been uploaded after the suit was already instituted.

Reaffirming its commitment to neutrality and adherence to judicial orders, INEC urged political actors to avoid actions that could jeopardize preparations for the 2027 general elections. The leadership tussle within the ADC remains before the Federal High Court in Abuja, where a final determination is expected in due course.

By Uzair Adam

Former Kano State Governor, Rabiu Musa Kwankwaso, on Monday formally aligned with the African Democratic Congress (ADC), a development observers describe as a significant moment for opposition politics in Nigeria.

The Daily Reality reports that the party’s National Chairman, David Mark, received Kwankwaso and his supporters at his residence on Monday.

Mark said Kwankwaso’s decision to join the party represented more than a political realignment, noting that it reflected growing calls by Nigerians for a united and formidable opposition capable of safeguarding democratic values.

He explained that the ADC was emerging as a rallying platform for a broad-based national movement founded on inclusion, integrity, competence and progress.

According to him, the coalition aims to offer Nigerians credible alternatives and rebuild public confidence in democratic governance.

Mark also expressed concern over what he described as a gradual shrinking of opposition space in the country, warning that actions capable of limiting political participation could threaten democracy.

“The future of Nigeria cannot be built on domination but on participation. Leadership must be earned through trust rather than sustained by control,” he said.

The ADC chairman noted that Kwankwaso commands a large grassroots following, particularly in Northern Nigeria, through the Kwankwasiyya movement.

He called on Nigerians across ethnic, religious and regional lines to join the movement and play active roles in building a more inclusive and accountable system of governance.

Mark also invited other political parties, civil society organisations and youth groups to work towards a united coalition, stressing that strengthening democracy requires collective effort and sacrifice.

He expressed optimism that the emerging alliance could mark a turning point in Nigeria’s democratic journey, urging citizens to embrace unity, participation and hope in shaping the country’s future.

Earlier, Kwankwaso urged ADC supporters to register massively as members of the party.

He also encouraged them to promote the party’s ideals and prepare to elect credible leaders for good governance through registration with the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

By Anas Abbas

The African Democratic Congress (ADC) in Plateau State has conducted party primaries in 15 out of the 17 local government areas in preparation for the upcoming local government elections in the state.

Party officials disclosed that the exercise was part of the ADC’s strategy to select its candidates for the chairmanship and councillorship positions ahead of the council polls.

The primaries, according to the party, were carried out successfully across the affected local government areas.
The leadership of the party noted that members actively participated in the process, which they described as peaceful and transparent. They added that the exercise reflects the party’s commitment to internal democracy and grassroots participation.

However, the party is yet to complete the primaries in the remaining two local government areas; Mikang and Langtang. Officials assured that the process would soon be concluded in line with the timetable for the council elections.

The ADC also called on its members to remain united and committed as the party intensifies preparations for the local government polls in Plateau State.

By Zayyad I. Muhammad

Nigeria’s Fourth Republic, which commenced in 1999, introduced a distinctive political culture that has since become entrenched in the nation’s democratic practice. Governors automatically emerge as leaders of their political parties in their respective states.

Although this arrangement is not expressly written into the 1999 Constitution or party constitutions as a rigid rule, it has evolved into an accepted political convention. In practical terms, once a governor belongs to a political party, he becomes the undisputed leader of that party in the state.

This “default” leadership status flows from the enormous constitutional powers, financial control, and political influence vested in state governors. Under the 1999 Constitution, governors are the chief executives of their states, control significant public resources, influence appointments, and play central roles in policy direction. These powers naturally position them as dominant actors within the political structure of their states. Political parties, being vehicles for acquiring and exercising power, inevitably gravitate toward the governor as their rallying point.

Critics often argue that this arrangement departs from earlier republican experiences. During Nigeria’s First, Second, and even Third Republics, governors and presidents were not automatically regarded as the formal leaders of their parties at the state or national levels. Party structures were often more independent, with clearer institutional separation between party leadership and executive office holders. However, Nigeria’s political system has evolved significantly since then. The current democratic framework places far greater burden, administrative authority, fiscal control, and political leverage in the hands of governors than was previously the case. It’s about the position!

The emergence of governors as de facto party leaders is not accidental but a result of political evolution shaped by key realities. The 1999 Constitution centralises executive authority in governors, making them the most powerful figures in their states. They also control critical political resources, finances, networks, appointments, and patronage, which are essential for party survival and electoral success. In a competitive electoral environment, incumbency provides structure, visibility, and mobilisation strength that few others can match.

Above all, political parties require unified command; without clear leadership at the state level, factionalism and instability can easily arise.

Imagine the chaos and unhealthy rivalry that could engulf a political party if a sitting governor chose to remain indifferent to party affairs. Competing factions would struggle for supremacy. Conflicting directives could weaken party cohesion. Such fragmentation could easily cost the party elections and governance effectiveness.

Furthermore, when it comes to interfacing between the executive arm at the federal level and party structures within the states, particularly in matters relating to appointments, political negotiations, federal-state collaboration, and reward systems, the governor’s role becomes indispensable. Governors serve as the bridge between national party leadership and grassroots political actors. In fact, Presidents often rely on Governors to win a state 

Just as the President functions as the leader of his party at the national level, governors serving as party leaders in their states create symmetry within the political order. This structure promotes stability, clarity of authority, strategic coordination, and internal discipline.

It is therefore not surprising that across Nigeria’s 21 registered political parties, this practice is widely accepted. Once a governor joins a party, he naturally assumes leadership of that party in the state, not necessarily by proclamation, but by political reality.

While debates may continue about whether this system strengthens internal party democracy or concentrates excessive influence in one individual, its practical utility in maintaining order, direction, and electoral viability cannot be ignored.

The emergence of governors as party leaders in their states reflects the reality on the ground, political necessity, and democratic evolution in Nigeria’s Fourth Republic.

Zayyad I. Muhammad writes from Abuja via zaymohd@yahoo.com.

By Sabiu Abdullahi

The All Progressives Congress (APC) has dismissed allegations by the African Democratic Congress (ADC) linking it to a reported shooting involving ADC members in Edo State, describing the claims as unfounded and premature.

In a press statement signed by Felix Morka, National Publicity Secretary of the APC in Abuja on February 26, 2026, the APC said the opposition party had rushed to conclusions without allowing security agencies to investigate the incident.

“The African Democratic Congress (ADC) is, undoubtedly, its own nemesis. It needs no external help to achieve its political demise. The party is doing a good job crippling itself even before it has time to stand on its feet.”

The ruling party criticised the ADC leadership, accusing it of making reckless claims and disregarding due process.

“In its press statement of February 25, 2026, the ADC claimed that the APC was responsible for the shooting incident involving its members in Edo State. That is utterly delusional. Accusing the APC even before any investigation is carried out by law enforcement is particularly senseless, and shows the ADC as a party that lacks focus and without regard for the due process of law.”

The APC added that such allegations suggest that the ADC had assumed multiple roles in the matter.

“By its baseless conclusion, the party has declared itself to be the accuser, investigator, prosecutor, and judge in its own cause.”

The party questioned the ADC’s capacity to manage national issues, especially security concerns.

“Nigerians must wonder how a party that cannot manage a single incident with proper guidance, maturity, and in line with legal and constitutional process can be trusted to manage the complexities of Nigeria’s security environment.”

It also faulted the ADC’s reference to alleged acts of terrorism, describing the claim as irresponsible.

“The ADC’s reference to ‘cases of acts of terrorism by the ruling APC against our party’, in its presser, is reckless and unjustifiable.”

The APC maintained that such remarks show a lack of awareness of the country’s security challenges and the sacrifices of security personnel.

“It’s flippant accusation clearly shows that the ADC is out of touch with the prevailing realities of the country’s war on terror, and insensitive to the patriotic sacrifices of our troops in the frontlines in defence of our lives and liberty.”

While condemning political violence, the party called for a proper probe into the Edo incident.

“Make no mistake, violence of any kind in our political space is unacceptable and must be condemned by all well meaning Nigerians. Our great Party roundly condemns the reported shooting incident in Edo state. We call on police and other law enforcement authorities to carry out an expeditious investigation into the incident and bring the perpetrators to justice.”

The APC further suggested that investigators should examine internal issues within the ADC.

“Investigation of this incident should begin with a thorough scrutiny of the ADC, its leaders and members as prime suspects.”

It alleged that internal disputes within the ADC could be linked to the incident.

“Among other leads, law enforcement investigation should focus on widely reported violent clashes and confrontations among its factional leaders over control and access to certain meetings of the party.”

The party insisted it had no involvement in the incident and stated that it remains focused on recent electoral successes.

“To be clear, the APC has absolutely no role or responsibility in the unfortunate shooting incident. We are too busy taking stock of our recent  big wins in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) municipal elections, and the Rivers and Kano states constituency elections to pay any attention to a fringe and inconsequential meeting of ADC political wanderers in Edo state.”

The APC also took a swipe at the ADC’s performance in recent elections.

“The ADC should be just as busy trying to fathom its back-to-back dismal and disgraceful performance in previous and recent by-elections in the country despite its nuisance rants.”

The party expressed appreciation to voters and reaffirmed its commitment to governance under President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

“We are grateful to Nigerians for the solid and growing support of our great Party. We particularly appreciate the electorate in the FCT, Kano and Rivers states for their eloquent vote of confidence in our Party, and in the visionary and transformative leadership of President Bola Tinubu, GCFR.”

It concluded by restating its focus on national development.

“Our Party and Mr President remain focused on building a stronger, more resilient and prosperous country for the good of all Nigerians.”