Russia

By Hadiza Abdulkadir

In his first Sunday message as Pope, Leo XIV made a powerful plea for peace, urging an immediate end to the conflicts in Ukraine and Gaza. 

Addressing the faithful gathered in St. Peter’s Square, the pontiff called for “an authentic and lasting peace” in Ukraine, emphasising the devastating human cost of the ongoing war. 

He further implored for a ceasefire in Gaza, demanding the release of all Israeli hostages held captive.

“The world yearns for peace,” Pope Leo XIV stated, his voice resonating across the square. “We must strive for dialogue and understanding, putting an end to the violence that inflicts immeasurable suffering. In Ukraine, let the weapons fall silent, and in Gaza, let the hostages be released.”

His message underscored the Vatican’s continued commitment to promoting peace and reconciliation in conflict-plagued regions. 

The Pope’s appeal resonated with many, who hope his words may inspire concrete action toward achieving a lasting resolution.

By Hadiza Abdulkadir

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has reiterated his country’s commitment to achieving peace and stated that his country is prepared to negotiate as soon as possible. 

In a statement posted on social media, Zelenskyy emphasised that “nobody desires peace more than Ukrainians” and expressed his readiness to collaborate with U.S. President Donald Trump’s leadership to secure a lasting resolution. 

He proposed initial measures, including a prisoner exchange and an immediate ceasefire on aerial and naval assaults, contingent on Russia’s reciprocity.

Zelenskyy also acknowledged the critical role the U.S. has played in supporting Ukraine’s sovereignty, particularly highlighting Trump’s past decision to provide Javelin missiles. He stressed the importance of continued cooperation with Washington and expressed disappointment over a recent White House meeting that did not go as expected. 

Calling for constructive dialogue, Zelenskyy urged U.S. officials to work together to make things right and advance peace efforts.

The Ukrainian leader reiterated his country’s readiness to sign a security and mineral resources agreement at any moment. He described the deal as a step toward stronger security guarantees and expressed hope for effective implementation.

By Sabiu Abdullahi

President of Ukraine, Volodymyr Zelensky, has expressed concerns that the United States is attempting to “please” Russian President Vladimir Putin as peace negotiations aimed at ending the nearly three-year-long war commence in Saudi Arabia today.

The talks, which exclude Ukraine and the European Union, were organized under the directive of US President Donald Trump.

This decision has prompted European leaders to hold emergency discussions in Paris over concerns about the potential outcome.

Zelensky has warned that any agreement favoring Russia could lead to Europe’s military “weakness,” particularly if Moscow is allowed to dictate the terms.

A delegation comprising senior officials from both Russia and the US arrived in Saudi Arabia on Monday, but Ukraine’s leader has expressed discontent over what he perceives as conciliatory remarks from US officials toward Russia.

Earlier reports indicate that Zelensky made it clear on Monday that Ukraine would reject any peace deal that does not involve his country and the United Kingdom.

“The US is now saying things that are very favourable to Putin… because they want to please him. They want to meet quickly and have a quick win. But what they want — ‘just a ceasefire’ — is not a win,” Zelensky said, as translated by broadcaster ARD in an interview conducted in Munich.

During his campaign, Trump pledged to end the Russia-Ukraine war within his first 100 days in office. Last week, he announced that he had spoken directly with Putin regarding a swift resolution to the conflict.

Reports suggest that any potential agreement may heavily favor Russia, including provisions that would prevent Ukraine from joining NATO and hinder efforts to reclaim territories lost since 2014.

Despite this, Zelensky has firmly stated that Ukraine “will not sign just anything in order to be applauded,” emphasizing that “the fate of our state for generations to come” is at stake.

He also dismissed the idea of conceding Ukrainian land occupied by Russian forces, affirming: “We will reclaim it all.”

Meanwhile, European leaders convened an urgent meeting in Paris on Monday to discuss strengthening their military independence and increasing support for Ukraine.

While they opposed the US approach to peace negotiations, they also highlighted the importance of maintaining NATO unity.

Zelensky has cautioned that Europe’s security remains fragile if it cannot depend on US military support. However, he noted that Ukraine has grown more resilient over the past three years, stating that “Putin wouldn’t be able to occupy us the way he wanted to.”

Nevertheless, he acknowledged that “there will definitely not be a Ukrainian victory without US support.”

He also revealed that he and Trump had discussed the deployment of foreign troops to oversee any future ceasefire agreements.

By Sabiu Abdullahi

The Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) and the Russian Federation have underscored the crucial role of oil and energy market stability in driving economic growth.

This emphasis was made during the Ninth High-level Meeting of the OPEC-Russia Energy Dialogue, held in Moscow, Russia, on November 22, 2024. 

Co-chaired by HE Alexander Novak, Deputy Prime Minister of the Russian Federation, and HE Haitham Al Ghais, Secretary General of OPEC, the meeting highlighted the significance of cooperation between OPEC and the Russian Federation. 

“Russia will continue to be a key player in the oil market, maintaining its status as a reliable supplier,” said Alexander Novak.

“The OPEC+ member countries are in constant contact, monitor the market situation and are ready to flexibly and promptly respond to any changes in market conditions.” 

Haitham Al Ghais praised the partnership between the Russian Federation and OPEC, commending the Russian Federation’s leadership role in the ‘Declaration of Cooperation’ framework.

The Secretary General also noted the importance of the OPEC-Russia Energy Dialogue as a platform for discussion and knowledge sharing. 

The meeting discussed developments in global oil and energy markets, climate change negotiations at COP29, and issues related to energy security, underinvestment, and market stability.

The next high-level meeting of the OPEC-Russia Energy Dialogue is scheduled to take place in Vienna, Austria, in 2025.

By Abdullahi Muhammad 

The Hausa Community Organization, Al-Ummar Hausawa Mazauna Rasha, appointed caretaker leaders to oversee operations. New officials include Abubakar Abdullahi Musa as Public Relations Officer (PRO), Aminu Taura as president, and Ahmad Garba Yakubu as vice president.

Founded in 2023 by Arewa youth, the organization fosters unity and collaboration among Hausa people in Russia. It supports students, professionals, and workers by providing a platform for their interests and promoting cultural and social engagement.

Last week, the community held its second online meeting with Hausa participants from various regions of Russia. The agenda focused on selecting interim leaders to guide the organisation during its formation.

Following discussions, nominees for key positions were identified, and messages were sent to confirm appointments. The caretaker team is expected to oversee the organization’s structure, engage members, and outline objectives that align with community goals.

Speaking on his nomination, Abubakar Abdullahi Musa expressed gratitude and commitment to serving the Hausa community in Russia. He noted that the organisation represents an opportunity to strengthen bonds among Hausa individuals and provide solutions to challenges members face in a foreign land.

The Hausa Community Organization in Russia anticipates continuous progress under its newly established leadership. It aims to strengthen the sense of belonging and solidarity among its members.

By Anwar Usman 

The Federal Government has said there is an ongoing plan to improve the welfare of minors detained over their alleged participation in the nationwide #EndBadGovernance protest. 

This was disclosed in a statement by the Minister of Youths Development, Ayodele Olawande, on Friday. 

Earlier today, there was uproar at the Federal High Court sitting in Abuja after some of the arraigned minors fainted and a great number of them looking malnourished after being detained for three months. 

The court later ruled that they be granted bail in the sum of N10 million each, while the prosecutor asked the judge to remove the names of those who collapsed from the charge. 

While reacting to the development, Olawande said the ministry is “engaging with the ministry of interior towards finding out the facts of the situation and improving the welfare of the young people being held, not just in relation to this case but in correctional centres across the country”. 

He further added, “Please rest assured of the Ministry’s commitment to protecting youth’s interests and the welfare of young Nigerians, wherever they may be”. 

More details later…

By Abdurrazak Muktar Makarfi 

Regret is a universal human emotion, a lingering shadow often following negligence or poor decision-making. It can be personal, like not putting in enough effort to achieve a desired goal, or it can be monumental, affecting entire nations or history. From personal experiences to the grand scale of global events, regret reminds us of the consequences of our actions—or inactions.

I, too, am a living witness to this. I aimed for a higher degree classification during my undergraduate studies, hoping to graduate with a Second Class Upper or even a First Class. However, due to a lack of focus and dedication, I had a second-class lower. I realise now that my negligence led to this outcome, which reminds us that what we fail to do today can haunt us tomorrow. In this case, regret is the product of what I did not do rather than what I did.

However, personal regrets are not unique to every person. Even the most powerful, successful, and celebrated figures in history have experienced regret for their actions or oversights. These moments of reflection often come too late, after the damage has been done, and serve as cautionary tales for the rest of us.

Napoleon Bonaparte and the Russian Campaign

One of history’s most infamous military campaigns is Napoleon Bonaparte’s invasion of Russia in 1812. His quest for dominance over Europe led him to undertake an ill-fated military venture that ended in disaster. Over 400,000 of his troops perished due to a combination of Russian scorched-earth tactics and the brutal winter. While Napoleon was not one to publicly admit fault, accounts suggest he acknowledged the enormity of his mistake. His ambition, unchecked by the realities of war, led to the unravelling of his empire and his eventual exile. In this case, the regret came too late to save his soldiers or his reign.

Robert McNamara and the Vietnam War

In modern history, Robert McNamara’s role in the Vietnam War stands as a significant example of deep, public regret. As U.S. Secretary of Defense, McNamara was a key architect of the war, which led to the loss of tens of thousands of American lives and countless Vietnamese. Years later, in his memoir *In Retrospect* and in interviews, McNamara admitted that the war was a mistake, reflecting on the misguided policies and assumptions that drove U.S. involvement. His regret was genuine, a stark acknowledgement that decisions made without fully considering their consequences can lead to tragedy on an unimaginable scale.

Oskar Schindler: The Regret of Not Doing More

Oskar Schindler is remembered as a hero for saving more than 1,200 Jews during the Holocaust. However, Schindler sincerely regrets not saving more lives despite his extraordinary efforts. He famously broke down in tears after the war, lamenting that he could have sold more of his possessions to rescue more people from the horrors of the Nazi regime. His regret was both real and deeply personal, showing that even those who do good can be haunted by the thought that they could have done more.

Thomas Jefferson and the Paradox of Slavery

Thomas Jefferson, one of the Founding Fathers of the United States, is a figure whose legacy is intertwined with regret and contradiction. Although he wrote eloquently about the moral wrongs of slavery, he continued to own slaves throughout his life. In his later years, Jefferson expressed regret for the institution of slavery, calling it a “moral depravity” and a “hideous blot” on the American experiment. Yet, he never entirely acted on his convictions, and his words often rang hollow in light of his continued participation in the system he condemned. His regret was intellectual but lacked the moral courage to manifest in his actions.

J. Robert Oppenheimer and the Atomic Bomb

Few regrets in history are as profound as J. Robert Oppenheimer’s remorse over the creation of the atomic bomb. As the lead scientist of the Manhattan Project, Oppenheimer’s work led to the development of the most destructive weapon ever used in warfare. After witnessing the devastation of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Oppenheimer famously quoted the Bhagavad Gita: “Now I become Death, the destroyer of worlds.” His regret was not just for the immediate destruction caused by the bomb but also for the moral implications of unleashing such power on humanity. He spent much of his later life advocating against further development of nuclear weapons, but the legacy of his creation haunted him until his death.

The Lessons of Regret

What can we learn from these stories? Whether in personal or historical contexts, regret often arises when we fail to align with our values or ignore the consequences of our decisions. Napoleon’s ambition, McNamara’s overconfidence, Schindler’s sense of responsibility, Jefferson’s moral paradox, and Oppenheimer’s scientific pursuit—all illustrate the different forms that regret can take.

In my own case, I can see that my negligence in my studies was not just a matter of missed marks but of missed opportunities to reach my full potential. The grades I received reflected not just academic performance but also personal responsibility. Regret teaches us to confront the results of our choices and, perhaps more importantly, to make better decisions going forward.

In the end, regret is not just about what we did but about what we failed to do when it mattered most. While it’s a heavy burden to carry, it also offers a powerful lesson: that attention, dedication, and foresight can often prevent us from looking back in sorrow.

Abdurrazak Muktar Makarfi wrote via prof4true1@gmail.com.

By Rabi Ummi Umar

The protest in Nigeria has taken a tragic turn with the display of foreign flags by some Northern youths as a demonstration against the government. This action undermines Nigeria’s sovereignty and raises concerns about the changing dynamics in the world.

As the Punch editorial pointed out, the flag-waving campaign shows that Nigeria should be wary of foreign interference, as witnessed in the crises in some West African countries that led to undemocratic military takeovers. There are speculations that some protesters were sponsored to raise the Russian flag as a deliberate attempt to provoke the military into intervention.

While Nigerians can express their grievances over economic hardship, they should do so through legitimate and peaceful means. Resorting to violent demonstrations that result in loss of life and destruction of livelihoods is counterproductive.

It is concerning that underage protesters and youths were the ones mostly flaunting the Russian flags, forcing security agents to clamp down on them. The government should be compassionate in dealing with these minors, as they may be ignorant of the implications of their actions. Rather than facing harsh punishments, they should be sent to remand centres for civil education and skills training.

The media have reported the loss of lives and an estimated daily loss of N400 billion due to the protests. This raises the question of whether the demonstrations were truly worth the cost.

The government should be open to dialogue and engagement with citizens to address their challenges. The security services, too, should be vigilant and professional in handling protesters, especially the young ones.

The Nigeria Immigration Service has a crucial role to play in checking the influx of foreigners with ulterior motives, as there have been allegations of illegal immigrants participating in the protests.

Religious and community leaders should admonish their followers on the consequences of unbecoming behaviours and appeal to the government to address the citizens’ concerns.

Despite the hardship, Nigerians must remain patriotic and respect their country’s sovereignty. Raising flags of other countries and seeking their intervention in domestic affairs is a treasonable offence.

The government should realize that the majority of the citizens are against the protest, not because they are not feeling the pinch of hardship, but because they believe the issue can be resolved through other peaceful means. The government should, therefore, take appropriate actions to address the citizens’ concerns.

Nigeria will overcome this challenge, but change begins with us.

Rabi Ummi Umar wrote from the Department of Mass Communication, Al-Hikmah University, Ilorin. She can be reached via rabiumar058@gmail.com.

By Uzair Adam

There is growing concern over the recent actions of protesters in Nigeria, particularly in the north, where aggrieved youths were seen waving the Russian flag during demonstrations against hunger and starvation in the country.

The Daily Reality reports that the “EndBadGovernance” protest began on August 1st and saw a large turnout. Many youths and women took to the streets to voice their worries amid worsening economic hardship.

However, the protests took an unexpected turn when demonstrators were seen waving the Russian flag and chanting slogans, asking for Russia to come to their rescue as the biting economic hardship exacerbated with each passing day.

Political Analysts React

Political analysts suggest that waving the Russian flag may stem from ignorance of global politics, describing the situation as an incredible display of “unpatriotism” by the aggrieved youths and women.

Russia as the Last Hope

The protesters argued that they knew exactly what they were doing and viewed their actions as a passionate plea to the Russian government to rescue the Nigerian masses from their devastating challenges. 

The youths, who perceive Russia as a “freedom fighter” for African countries, said they would never seek help from England, despite its historical ties to Nigeria, as they believe England harbours bad intentions against the country.

A group of youths told our reporter that they are pleading for Russian intervention since England remains silent on Nigeria’s problems. “America, too, will not speak because it is in the same boat as England,” they argued.

Ibrahim Muhammad (not his real name) said they were waving the flag to frustrate the federal government and clarify that they no longer cared for a country that had ignored their concerns. 

“I am waving this flag to make President Bola Ahmad Tinubu sad. These people don’t care about our problems and do whatever it takes to make us angry,” he stated.

Another protester, Isma’il Usman, said Russia is the only country they should now turn to for help, “especially looking at its recent interventions in some African countries.”

When Ignorance and Unpatriotism Shake Hands

According to analysts who spoke to The Daily Reality, the waving of the Russian flag by the youths is a demonstration of both ignorance and unpatriotism.

Professor Kamilu Sani Fagge, a lecturer in the Department of Political Science at Bayero University Kano, noted that while youths lack an understanding of global politics, certain individuals may have lured them into doing so. 

“There could be some people behind this movement, and people were pushed to the wall in this country, which could also be why they accepted to wave the flag during the protest,” he stated.

“However, the government is to blame for all this because it should have taken action to stop the protest by addressing these problems, but it refused. Now that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has addressed the nation, there is still no hope,” Professor Fagge added.

An Invitation to Neo-Colonialism

Another analyst, Malam Sulaiman Muhammad, a lecturer at Aminu Kano College of Islamic and Legal Studies, argued that government negligence has deteriorated the situation, leading to more unpatriotic youth in the country. 

He warned that by pleading for Russian intervention, the youths are ignorantly inviting a new form of colonialism.

“I think the youths are not seeking intervention from England and France because England colonised Nigeria and the latter colonised Nigeria’s sister country, Niger. However, they forget that pleading for Russian soldiers’ presence in Nigeria is another form of colonialism,” he stated.

Disappointment as Russia Distances Itself

In a statement on Monday, the Russian Embassy in Nigeria issued a strong denial of any involvement with the group of protesters who were seen carrying the Russian flag and chanting slogans in support of President Vladimir Putin. 

The embassy stressed that Russia respects Nigeria’s sovereignty and does not interfere in its internal affairs, a statement that may not please the Russian flag-waving protesters. 

The statement described the protesters’ actions as personal choices that do not reflect any official Russian government policy.

However, one of these aggrieved youths said they would only stop pleading with the Russians once their voices were heard by the Russian President, Vladimir Putin.

Arrest of Tailor Sewing Russian Flags

However, the tailor who sewed the Russian flags for the protesters was reportedly arrested by security personnel on Monday. 

A picture seen by The Daily Reality showed the youth, whose name was not identified, being arrested with some of the flags he had sewn and his sewing machine.

Defense Chief Condemns Protesters’ Actions

Nigeria’s Chief of Defense, General Chris Musa, condemned the protesters’ actions as treasonable and warned they would face the full force of the law.

By Sabiu Abdullahi

The Russian Embassy in Nigeria has issued a strong denial of any involvement with a group of protesters in northern Nigeria who were seen carrying Russian flags and chanting slogans in support of President Vladimir Putin. 

In a statement released on Monday, the embassy noted that Russia respects Nigeria’s sovereignty and does not interfere in its internal affairs.

The statement described the protesters’ actions as “personal choices” that do not reflect any official Russian government policy or position. 

The embassy’s denial comes amid concerns about external interference in regional affairs, with Russia accused of involvement in recent political upheavals in several West African countries. 

Nigeria’s Chief of Defence, General Chris Musa, has condemned the protesters’ actions as treasonable and warned that they will face the full force of the law. 

The incident has sparked a diplomatic row, with Nigeria’s government facing pressure to explain how the protesters obtained Russian flags and what their motivations were.