LGBTQ+

UK Supreme Court rules legal definition of ‘woman’ based on biological sex

By Maryam Ahmad

In a landmark decision, the UK Supreme Court has ruled that the terms “woman” and “sex” in the Equality Act 2010 refer exclusively to biological sex, thereby excluding transgender women from the legal definition of “woman” under this legislation.

The unanimous ruling stems from a legal challenge by the feminist group For Women Scotland against a 2018 Scottish law that included transgender women in quotas for women’s representation on public boards. The Court determined that such inclusion would render the Equality Act incoherent, as it would create two sub-groups within those who share the protected characteristic of gender reassignment.

Supporters of the ruling, including author J.K. Rowling, hailed it as a victory for women’s rights and legal clarity. Conversely, LGBTQ+ advocacy groups such as Stonewall expressed deep concern, warning that the decision could lead to increased exclusion of transgender individuals from essential services and spaces.

While the ruling clarifies the legal definition of “woman” under the Equality Act, it does not diminish existing protections against discrimination for transgender individuals based on gender reassignment. The practical implications of this decision will depend on future implementation and interpretation by institutions and policymakers.

Niger junta proposes five-year military rule

By Abdullahi Mukhtar Algasgaini

Niger’s military junta has proposed a five-year transition period of military rule before returning power to civilians.

The announcement was made during a recent summit, where Salha Haladou, head of the Economic and Sustainable Development Committee, presented the plan.

The proposal includes aligning Niger’s economy with the Sahel region’s AES economic policies, reducing the government workforce to cut costs, rejecting LGBT+ initiatives, and tightening control over media and social platforms.

Additionally, the junta has approved mandatory military service for all young citizens who complete their education.

The plan has sparked mixed reactions. Some citizens and regional allies support the reforms, citing the need for stability and economic integration.

However, critics, including human rights groups and Western nations, worry about the impact on democratic freedoms and the extended timeline for military rule.

Niger faces ongoing challenges, including security threats from extremist groups and economic difficulties.

The junta’s ability to implement these reforms while maintaining public trust will be closely watched in the coming months.

Trump limits flags on government buildings — no more LGBTQ or BLM flags

By Maryam Ahmad

The Trump administration has reportedly issued a directive restricting the display of flags on government buildings, embassies, and military bases worldwide. According to a report by the Washington Free Beacon, which obtained a copy of the document, the new policy permits only the U.S. flag and select military symbols to be flown.

Although the directive does not explicitly mention specific flags, media outlets have interpreted the move as a ban on displaying symbols such as LGBT and Black Lives Matter (BLM) flags, which were frequently flown alongside the U.S. flag during the Biden administration.

This policy aligns with Trump’s broader cultural stance, including a previous decree recognising only two genders—male and female—in official U.S. government documents and policies.

The decision has sparked debate. Supporters praise the emphasis on national and military symbols, while critics view it as a step back in terms of inclusivity and representation.

LGBTQ+ bill and the magic of word choice

By Isma’il Hashim Abubakar 

I was prompted to pen this essay by two writeups of prominent newspaper columnists: Mr Gimba Kakanda and Professor Farouk Kperogi. The latter is one of the people I have been following due to their mastery of using his pen to communicate ideas. Both Kakanda and Kperogi have painstakingly struggled to deodorise the infamous Samoa (perhaps it’s more suitable to call it Tamoa) Agreement and exculpate it of its meticulously wrapped pro-LGBTQ+ substances. 

Maybe the authors of the document containing details of this agreement are so cunningly sagacious to beat the conscience and intelligence of the Atlanta word master who, as far I know him, is so wide-eyed to read things between the line and discern and decode messages from even unarticulated and not well coughed or well-lettered communications. Farouk Kperogi is not at all that simplistic type of a person that one could hoodwink by suggesting to him that a week is different from seven days or a year is anything else but twelve months. 

The 12-page document explicating different stages of agreements entered into by the EU and African, Caribbean and Pacific states is so clear in the very first paragraph that “the multiple negotiation levels, the coronavirus crisis and difficulties in reaching agreement on sensitive issues, such as migration management and sexual and reproductive health and rights, …”. A witty reader would not even wait to be told that sexual rights emphasised in the quote would never mean the existing sexual customs prevailing in the beneficiary states just as no one will argue that sexual rights in this sense refer to what the West conceives of as new normal, acceptable sexual culture.

All the dull, lengthy noise and regular references to vague resolutions and procedures in the document, beating around the bush in most instances, reflect strategies meant just to propagate the incongruous norms the West is relentlessly hellbent on imposing on third-world countries. It may also sound controversial if one claims that the so-called autonomous countries like ours are, in real and practical terms, undergoing another form of colonialism in the modern day, of course, heavily pretentious, more diplomatic, possibly negotiable, and less confrontational.

Daily Trust, the newspaper outlet that took centre stage in unravelling Nigeria’s role in this agreement, should be commended for quickly alerting Nigerians to what our increasingly gluttonous, money-hungry leaders who could not resist a dubious multimillion-dollar loan are up to. 

The document being circulated currently seems not to be the only manual laying guidelines and terms of the negotiations. It refers to a monitoring group under the Committee on Development (DEVE) set up by the European Parliament, whose consent was crucial in the approval of the negotiations. In the report submitted to the  EU through the DEVE committee, several recommendations were adopted, including a particular “chapter on human rights” which “should explicitly list the forms of discrimination that should be combated (such as sexual, ethnic, or religious discriminations) and mention sexual and reproductive rights”.  

It appears that while the available document now within public reach may remain implicit and brief about the nature of rights this bill wants to get protected, there are appendixes which may be at the domains of leaders and top representatives of concerned countries and which explain in greater details and specify perhaps in exact terms the list of kinds of the so-called discriminations that must be stopped once the agreement is entered into. 

Admittance that there are divergences in positions on sexual orientation and gender identity (LGBTI rights) among EU Member States is not a definite declaration or solemn undertaking that this agreement will not pursue that goal. It doesn’t require any mental labour to know where this agreement is heading, even if it does not now literally endorse LGBTQ+. The reference in the agreement document about scepticism and misgivings nurtured by some affected countries is nothing but a deceptive pretence of objectivity and balancing, such that later it will be presented as a mere debate and leaning toward the LGBTQ+ as a mere result of in-house voting among donor institutions, vetoing the concerns of and leaving affected countries like our own with no option but to accept and be committed to the terms based on which we are handsomely paid. 

In fact, without any further denial, disclaimer or clarification, the document observes that “prior to the signing of the agreement in Samoa, several African and Caribbean CSOs called on their governments not to sign the agreement, fearing that it might lead to modifying domestic laws, in particular, to endorse LGBTI rights”. The authors do not attempt to deny the allegation above or make any further comments that will allay existing fears, thereby reminding us tacitly that to be forewarned is to be forearmed.

Both Kakanda and Kperogi capitalise on the lack of literal mention to promote Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, and Queer (LGBTQ+) in the document, thereby accusing the Daily Trust of misguided reporting but also rubbishing the understanding of the majority of Nigerians who interpreted the clauses emphasising the need to protect sexual rights and orientation as another way of reintroducing LGBTQ+ using the power of juicy loans. 

Since Kakanda is in government, we have no difficulty forming the proper framework to read his intervention. As a former activist now enjoying dividends of democracy, one should either keep quiet if one cannot defend the truth or at least not pretend to be ignorant of how Nigeria is run and what are the ulterior motives and hidden goals behind all loans that the third world is lured into accepting.

Kakanda’s points revolve around the absence of explicit devotion and literal commitment to LGBTQ+. Kakanda reiterates the insignificance of the anxiety this new agreement saga is generating by referring to the anti-gay law signed during the Jonathan administration, and he thinks that is absolutely enough to guarantee our safety and to suggest that the money could be collected and consumed without serious implications and disastrous consequences. If Kakanda is sincere, let him advise the government in which he now serves to institute operational frameworks that will deploy the same anti-gay laws enacted about a decade ago to end the LGBTQ+ movement that already practically exists and is being rigorously promoted and advertised via social media platforms.

Meanwhile, Kperogi, who has built a reputation of siding with the masses always against different government antisocial policies, has fallen so low this time around to fail to discern that sexual rights and other terminologies used in the document are not even so vague to think they are different from all those bizarre rights and queer sexual orientation freedoms. We are all not oblivious to how highly sophisticated and cunning heirs of former colonialists are and not as gullible to declare support for the scary LGBTQ+ catchphrase glaringly in their proposal, given that they faced resistance in earlier phases of their project. We ought to be mature enough and vociferously critical to detect proposals to institute LGBTQ+ even by mere mention of key phrases like “gender violence”, “women’s and girl’s empowerment”, “fight against discrimination”, “right of self-determination”, and so on, not to talk of sexual and reproductive health rights.

Kperogi is merely angry that people have been, for operational reasons, refusing to kowtow to his admonition to rise and execute his yet esoteric, misunderstood and almost ‘impracticable’ revolution. Now that people seem to be once again united and appear determined to fight this dubious bill which is at our doorstep, which, to him perhaps, is innocuous or at least less harmful, Kperogi is tactically venting his anger on people and accusing them of misplacing priority. 

In other words, people in Kperogi’s theory should better fight anti-masses policies which institutions like the IMF and World Bank are forcing Nigeria to implement than jawbreaking and investing unnecessary energy on sexual rights issues, which, after all, is what he encounters in the U.S day in day out, unlike the excruciating poverty and bad governance that bedevil Nigeria. 

At any rate, within a decade or something like that, even as LGBTQ+ right was successfully illegalised and the law to fight it constitutionally still exists, there has been a proliferation of growing LGBTQ+ movements, largely operating without any hitch in the virtual world and particularly on the social media cyberspace. Who knows if institutions behind bills and agreements like the Samoa agreement do not sponsor those movements and groups? Why is there little or no evidence at all to show and establish that those breaking anti-gay laws and other unusual customs have been made to face the wrath of the law? 

Sexual rights agents, manifesting in many forms, have now become celebrities and operate freely on the media while clandestinely running ventures that everybody knows are nationally outlawed. Sponsors of these agreements might have been convinced that it is now the right time to secure legal frameworks for protecting their representatives, having taken some years to experiment and implement their projects successfully. 

We should not be deceived by any government defence on this matter—either by a government official or a likely bribed or even gagged scholar. We all know well what some powerful elements in the Western world are after when they set goals they want to achieve at all costs, deploying short—and long-term plans, even if the latter will span a century. As things go this way, let us ponder what will happen in the next 50 years for those who will live to see that period.

 As people are now sinking into excessive materialism, suffering from a lack of focus and shortsightedness,  and unduly obsessed with imitating the Western lifestyle, it is so hard to suggest that posterity could effectively challenge and fight bills like LGBTQ+.  Therefore, there is a need to start thinking of ways and techniques to instil zeal and introduce mechanisms for combatting moves like this in future. If they have not succeeded now, they have patience; they could wait and hope to see their plan triumph within less than a century from now. One better way to start tackling LGBTQ+ is to begin addressing the decline of morality that has been mainstreamed on social media now. Otherwise, once the law succeeds one day, God forbid, it will consume us unimaginably.

Isma’il writes from AERC, Rabat and can be reached via iahashim@fugusau.edu.ng.

NBA dismisses claims on Samoa agreement, LGBTQ rights

By Uzair Adam Imam

The Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has refuted claims that the Samoa Agreement, signed by the Federal Government, requires Nigeria to endorse or accept LGBTQ rights.

NBA President Yakubu Maikyau, in a statement, said that the agreement does not compromise Nigeria’s sovereignty or existing laws, including the Same Sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act, 2023.

Maikyau emphasized that the NBA would have advised against signing the agreement if it contravened Nigerian laws.

He urged stakeholders to educate the public on the agreement’s true content, countering negative narratives pushed along sensitive lines of faith, culture, and morality.

The agreement recognizes Nigeria’s existing laws and sovereignty, and the NBA calls for continued public enlightenment to counter misconceptions.

Maikyau stated, “There is no provision in the SAMOA agreement that requires Nigeria to accept or recognize LGBTQ or gay rights, either as a pre-condition for a loan of $150 Billion USD or at all.

“Instead, the agreement was expressly made subject to the local laws and the sovereignty of the contracting Nations.

“That is to say, the SAMOA agreement recognizes Nigeria’s Same Sex Marriage (Prohibition) Act, 2023 and the Supremacy of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).

“For the avoidance of any doubt, the SAMOA agreement does not seek to compromise our existing legislations nor undermine the sovereignty of Nigeria,” he added.

LGBTQ: An open letter to Kano State Governor, Abba Kabir Yusuf

Dear Government of Kano State, the Kano Emirate, Hisbah Board, and the Kano State Council of Ulamas

Peace be upon you,

An effort is being made to spread LGBTQ advocacy in Kano State in the name of human rights, seeking “freedom” and sustainable livelihoods for our daughters and helping orphans, the needy, and those with special needs.

This advocacy is being spread publicly without shame, disregarding your esteemed positions and influence in Kano State— in schools and neighbourhoods. Shockingly, even government officials were cornered in the name of dialogue or capacity building.

The organization behind this heinous act in our state is the Women Initiative for Sustainable Empowerment and Equality. They refer to themselves as “WISE.” From what we have seen on their platforms, they even have an independent office in Yankaba Kawaji, Bompai GRA, Kano.

In a statement we saw on the pages of this organization, we noted that they once organized a workshop for officials from Hisbah, KAROTA, NDLEA, and others!

If this organization has grown strong enough to gather these officials in one place under the guise of a workshop—regardless of the topic—we fear the influence they have already exerted in our state.

To verify all these, please check their Facebook page named “Wise.”

You might recall the recent uproar over the Samoa Agreement signed by the Federal Government, which is alleged to have come with strings attached, one of which is to allow advocates of LGBTQ, like WISE, to pursue their agenda freely.

This has sparked controversy in Nigeria over the past few days. We have seen how the scholars in Kano stood firm on their pulpits, as we expected, to vehemently condemn this attempt, should it prove true.

This controversy has further revealed that there are laws in our country that outright prohibit any attempt to propagate the agenda of LGBTQ. We have also found solace in the unity of Muslims and Christians in rejecting this thing we collectively see as immorality in our culture and religion.

With this, we call upon the Governor of Kano State, Alhaji Abba Kabir Yusuf, the Emir of Kano, Mallam Muhammadu Sanusi II, the Chairman of Hisbah, Mallam Aminu Daurawa, and the leadership of the Kano State Council of Ulamas, to ensure that this organization, WISE, packs up and leaves our dear state and that its activities are banned by any means possible.

The people of Kano State are your trust! And God will question you about this trust on the Day of Judgment!

We’ve done our part by letting you know about this issue. We have informed you if you were unaware of this organization or its activities.

Misbahu Hamza  

July 7, 2024

“LGBT movement” added to Russia’s terrorist list

By Muhammad Abdurrahman

Banks should freeze funds and suspend services to individuals and groups included on the list.

Russia’s Federal Financial Monitoring Service (Rosfinmonitoring) expanded its list of individuals and organizations involved in extremist activities or terrorism on Friday to include the LGBT movement. The updated list is available on the agency’s website.

According to the law, banks are required to freeze the funds of individuals included on this list and suspend services to them.

Last November, the Russian Supreme Court upheld the Ministry of Justice’s recognition of the international LGBT movement as extremist. The court also recognized its structural divisions as extremist and banned them.

According to Interfax sources, the law “does not affect citizens’ right to privacy and will not entail any negative legal consequences.” The restrictions are related to the need to comply with the ban on LGBT propaganda, advertising, generating interest, and involvement in the LGBT movement.

Source: RT

Qatar introduces Islam to World Cup fans through murals

By Ahmad Deedat Zakari

The Qatari government is preaching and introducing Islam to World Cup fans through murals placed in public places.

TRT World reported on Saturday that as Qatar prepares to host the 2022 FIFA World Cup, it has placed several murals in public places bearing Prophet Muhammad’s (PBUH) sayings and traditions written in Arabic and English.

According to the report, the murals feature various sayings on mercy, charity and good deeds. They are situated across the Pearl District, a popular tourist attraction in the Qatari capital, Doha.

The initiative of Qatar’s government has been applauded by many Arab journalists and Muslims worldwide.

Qatar’s government has been unpretentious about not compromising Islamic values because of the 2022 World Cup. However, their stance on homosexuality and the LGBTQ community has been critical; the government deems it unacceptable to their country’s values and norms.

The Head of Security for the 2022 Qatar World Cup, Major General Abdulaziz Abdullah Al Ansari, in a statement, said the country does not want LGBTQ flags in the venues of the World Cup, and LGBTQ is not acceptable to the country.

He said: You want to demonstrate your view about the LGBTQ situation, do it in a society where it will be accepted. Don’t insult the whole society because of this. You cannot change the religion for 28 days”.

Qatar is the first country in the Middle East to host the World Cup, the biggest tournament in the football world.

2022 World Cup: Qatar bans alcohol, LGBT, dating, others for fans

By Muhammadu Sabiu

Ahead of the 2022 World Cup, which begins on November 20, the tournament host, Qatar, has released a list of dos and don’ts, especially for fans from other countries.

The wealthy Gulf nation has disclosed that spectators coming should note the bans that have been in place on alcohol, the LGBT community, exposing parts of the female body, and swearing are still in effect.

The host added that disrespect for mosques, loud music and sounds, dating, and taking pictures of people without their consent, are also banned.

Apart from the moral rules, there are also regulations concerning COVID-19 and its vaccine.

The Supreme Committee for Delivery & Legacy mandated that all visitors six years of age and older show proof of a negative PCR test result obtained within 48 hours of their departure or a positive rapid antigen test result obtained within 24 hours of arrival.

Rapid antigen test results from legitimate medical facilities that are not self-administered only will be accepted. If visitors do not exhibit COVID-19 symptoms, no additional testing will be necessary in Qatar.

Additionally, everybody above 18-year-old must download the Ehteraz contact tracing phone app, which the government manages.

Russian courts fine Tiktok and Meta for not removing LGBTQ+ content

Newsbriefs

Russian courts have fined TikTok and Meta for failing to delete LGBTQ+ content. Meta was fined 4mn rubles by a court in Moscow. The US tech giant had failed to remove content that ‘promoted LGBTQ+ rights’, ruled the judges. 

TikTok was also fined 2mn rubles in another trial for a similar violation. LGBTQ+ advocacy, such as gay pride marches, and the pride flag, are banned in Russia.