Engineering

By Dr. Hamisu Adamu Dandajeh

It is not a conundrum that Nigerian STEM-based postgraduate students often perform incredibly well when they find themselves in foreign universities despite going through an “obsolete” curriculum. Nigerians are mostly on top of their classes abroad and compete favourably with other best students from all around the world who were taught with the so-called “up-to-date” curriculum. Some of us are witnesses to this anomaly, and the reason for this is simple! 

The Fundamental Principles of Engineering Science, such as gravity, thermodynamics, and fluid mechanics in most curricula in the world are inherently similar. What is markedly different are not only the methods, areas, and propensities of cutting-edge applications but also the relative mastery, tools, delivery, understanding and environment of the instructor. The key concepts are meant for you to think about. When these concepts are fully truly understood, one can solve any complex problem from one’s domain of expertise, starting from the first principle.

I have worked with the Mechanical Engineering curriculum of University College London (UCL), Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) and some modules at Cambridge University. These are the best universities in the world. I audited and developed curriculums in two MIT courses (2.005 Thermal Fluids Engineering and 2.60 Fundamentals of Advanced Energy Conversions), engaged 2nd and 3rd year UCL undergraduates in thermodynamic laboratories and developed engine laboratories similar to that of Cambridge. My experience is that because all the resources needed were readily available and the pedagogical learning outcomes were clear and student-centred, these fundamental concepts were used to derive and solve unbelievably sophisticated equations whose physical meanings and applications were well intended. I always call these universal, natural, and settled concepts, but their usage and applications depend on the goal they are meant to achieve.

Cambridge University has an integrated “Department” of Engineering, NOT ‘Faculty” for a reason. Undergraduate students are required to study general engineering in their 1st and 2nd years and then specialise in their preferred engineering discipline in their 3rd year. The first two years are expected to groom students with most engineering science principles for interdisciplinary problem-solving capabilities. My MSc project supervisor (Emeritus Prof. Chris Lawn) at Queen Mary University of London was a Cambridge graduate. I marvelled at how he developed, from first principles, thermo-fluid equations representing instantaneous mesoscale combustion processes.

A typical Nigerian Engineering curriculum is diverse, rich, and multi-disciplinary. For example, a graduate of Mechanical Engineering at Ahmadu Bello University is expected to take courses like Communication, History, Development Economics, Law of Contracts, Moral Philosophy, Financial Management, Statistics, Quality Control, Linear, complex, and Applied Mathematics. These are in addition to the core courses of thermodynamics, Control, Strength of Materials, Fluid-Mechanics, Hydrodynamics, Aerodynamics, Machine Design, Heat Transfer etc. The mathematics-heavy curriculum has the necessary analytical rigour to prepare and adapt candidates to any academic climate. This is why a third-class graduate from a Nigerian would successfully graduate with a First Class (Hons) in a TOP-UP degree from a UK University.

The fact that students from these global best institutions excel and are industry-ready, despite the common key fundamental principles with the Nigerian curriculum, is not surprising. These institutions further advance fundamental concepts with contemporary grant-ready research, and they establish a vibrant ecosystem that fosters innovation and growth, hence easily attracting the best minds (students and staff) from all corners of the world. Meritocracy is their criteria for admission and employment of manpower. No wonder Boston, Massachusetts, where MIT is situated, is an attractive centre for start-ups and scale-up Biotech companies. 

Nigerian universities can also translate these fundamental concepts to meaningful research and innovation, and for this to happen, the quadruple helix of Academia-Industry-Government-Society should not continue to stand on only one leg of the theoretical “academia” as the status quo. We should refrain our students from memorising and regurgitation of facts via testing “book knowledge” only; instead, we should produce thinkers and re-skilled graduates who would use these fundamental concepts to solve local and global problems.

My prior idea after my Fellowship at MIT was for the current STEM courses to be decentralised to produce the programs of the future. For example, instead of studying the bulk of “Renewable Energy” as a sub-course of an Engineering program, courses like “Wind Engineering”, “Solar Engineering”, and “Science & Engineering of Climate Change” should be redeveloped as separate programs. 

Computer Science could be split into minor courses such as “Data Science”, “Artificial Intelligence”, “Cybersecurity”, “Computational Linguistics”, and “Drone Technology”. Mechanical, Electrical, Biology and Electronics can produce courses on “Robotics and Biomedical Engineering”. 

Based on our experience with COVID-19, “Epidemiology” can also be developed as an independent program. We must all recognise that however excellent these suggestions may be, their success story would also rely heavily on the understanding and delivery of the fundamental principles of STEM.

Dr. Hamisu Adamu Dandajeh is currently a Senior Lecturer in Energy, Thermo-Fluid and Climate Change at the Ahmadu Bello University Zaria. He can be reached at hadandajeh@gmail.com.