Switzerland has halted the approval of licences for weapons exports to the United States due to the ongoing conflict involving Iran, citing its policy of neutrality.

The Swiss government announced the decision on Friday. It said the measure would remain in place for the duration of the war.

“The export of war materiel to countries involved ⁠in the international armed conflict with Iran cannot be authorised for the duration of the conflict,” the government said.

“Exports of war materiel to the USA ‌cannot currently be authorised,” it added.

The development comes as the US-Israel war on Iran approaches its third week. The conflict has worsened the humanitarian situation across the Middle East and pushed global energy prices higher.

Swiss authorities have also shut their airspace to US military flights connected to the war. Last weekend, officials rejected two requests from the US for overflight linked to Iran operations, although three others were approved.

Switzerland’s neutrality law guides decisions on arms transfers. A federal act adopted in 1996 requires export licences for military equipment. The law is based on respect for human rights and the country’s neutral stance.

Since the war began on February 28, Switzerland said it has not issued any new export licences to the United States.

The government noted that it has not granted definitive licences for arms exports to Israel for several years. The same position applies to Iran.

Existing licences issued to the US will now undergo periodic review by a panel of experts. The group will assess whether further action is needed under neutrality rules.

Officials also confirmed that exports of dual-use goods and certain military items will face regular checks.

“A restrictive approach is already in place with regard to Israel,” the government said.

Data from Swiss authorities show that the United States was the second-largest buyer of Swiss arms last year. The total value of exports stood at $119 million.

Switzerland has taken similar steps in the past. It blocked the transfer of Swiss-made weapons to Ukraine after Russia’s invasion in 2022. It also imposed restrictions on flights and arms exports during the US-led Iraq war in 2003, although those measures were later lifted.

Switzerland has halted the approval of licences for weapons exports to the United States due to the ongoing conflict involving Iran, citing its policy of neutrality.

The Swiss government announced the decision on Friday. It said the measure would remain in place for the duration of the war.

“The export of war materiel to countries involved ⁠in the international armed conflict with Iran cannot be authorised for the duration of the conflict,” the government said.

“Exports of war materiel to the USA ‌cannot currently be authorised,” it added.

The development comes as the US-Israel war on Iran approaches its third week. The conflict has worsened the humanitarian situation across the Middle East and pushed global energy prices higher.

Swiss authorities have also shut their airspace to US military flights connected to the war. Last weekend, officials rejected two requests from the US for overflight linked to Iran operations, although three others were approved.

Switzerland’s neutrality law guides decisions on arms transfers. A federal act adopted in 1996 requires export licences for military equipment. The law is based on respect for human rights and the country’s neutral stance.

Since the war began on February 28, Switzerland said it has not issued any new export licences to the United States.

The government noted that it has not granted definitive licences for arms exports to Israel for several years. The same position applies to Iran.

Existing licences issued to the US will now undergo periodic review by a panel of experts. The group will assess whether further action is needed under neutrality rules.

Officials also confirmed that exports of dual-use goods and certain military items will face regular checks.

“A restrictive approach is already in place with regard to Israel,” the government said.

Data from Swiss authorities show that the United States was the second-largest buyer of Swiss arms last year. The total value of exports stood at $119 million.

Switzerland has taken similar steps in the past. It blocked the transfer of Swiss-made weapons to Ukraine after Russia’s invasion in 2022. It also imposed restrictions on flights and arms exports during the US-led Iraq war in 2003, although those measures were later lifted.

By Sabiu Abdullahi

Iran has issued a strong warning to officials of the United States and Israel, stating that they are no longer safe anywhere in the world after recent attacks linked to both countries.

The warning came from a senior Iranian military spokesperson, Abolfazl Shekarchi, who said the risks faced by their adversaries may extend beyond traditional battle zones.

In a statement aired on Iranian state television, Shekarchi said, “From now on, based on the information we have about you, even parks, recreational areas and tourist destinations anywhere in the world will no longer be safe for you.”

The statement signals a sharp rise in tensions, as Tehran suggests it could widen the scope of its response to what it views as hostile actions.

The development follows a series of reported strikes connected to the United States and Israel. Iranian authorities have since pledged a firm response, which has added to fears of further escalation.

Observers say the latest remarks reflect growing concern over a possible expansion of the conflict, as threats continue to intensify between the sides.

The situation has also been fueled by reports of Israeli operations that led to the killing of senior Iranian officials, which has further deepened hostilities.

Meanwhile, the crisis appears to be drawing in more regional actors. The leader of Yemen’s Houthi Movement, Abdul-Malik al-Houthi, has announced support for Iran in the ongoing confrontation with the United States and Israel.

In a televised address monitored on Friday, Al-Houthi accused Washington of supporting Israel’s military actions in the region. He warned that any US involvement against Iran would be seen as a direct threat to Yemen and the broader “Islamic nation.

“Because he considers it the biggest obstacle in the way of accomplishing his plan,” Al-Houthi said.

He added, “Therefore, any attack or US aggression supporting the Israeli enemy against Iran within the framework of the goal itself, is a throw to empower the Israeli enemy from controlling the entire region. And this is what cannot be silenced.”

The comments mark a notable escalation from the Iran-aligned group, which has previously targeted shipping routes in the Red Sea and launched attacks linked to Israeli interests. Analysts warn that the growing rhetoric and alliances could push the region closer to a wider conflict.

By Uzair Adam

Kano State Governor, Alhaji Abba Kabir Yusuf, has congratulated residents of the state on the occasion of Eid-el-Fitr, marking the end of the holy month of Ramadan.

This was contained in a statement issued by the governor’s spokesperson, Sunusi Bature Dawakin Tofa.

Governor Yusuf described Eid-el-Fitr as a period for gratitude, reflection and renewed commitment to the values of faith, unity and compassion demonstrated throughout Ramadan.

He urged residents to celebrate the Sallah festivities peacefully and responsibly, cautioning against any actions that could disrupt the peace and stability of the state.

The governor stressed the need to sustain tolerance, mutual respect and peaceful coexistence among the people, regardless of their differences.

He also called on parents and guardians to guide their children to be law-abiding and to conduct themselves properly during the celebrations.

Governor Yusuf further encouraged residents to show kindness and support to the less privileged, in line with Islamic teachings, while reaffirming his administration’s commitment to safeguarding lives and property.

He also assured that adequate security arrangements have been put in place to ensure a hitch-free celebration across Kano State.

By Sabiu Abdullahi

A British journalist narrowly escaped death after a missile exploded just metres from his position while he was reporting in southern Lebanon on Thursday, March 19, 2026.

Steve Sweeney, the Lebanon Bureau Chief for RT, was covering the destruction of civilian infrastructure near the Al-Qasmiya Bridge when the strike occurred. Dramatic footage showed Sweeney diving for cover as the missile hit the ground behind him, sending thick black smoke into the air.

Both Sweeney and his cameraman, Ali Rida, suffered shrapnel injuries and were taken to a local hospital for emergency treatment.

After surgery to remove shrapnel from his arm, Sweeney accused the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) of trying to “silence” journalists reporting on what he described as a widespread campaign of ethnic cleansing.

“Today I$rael tried to kill me in a targeted airstrike in southern Lebanon as I was reporting on was the targeting of bridges and the forced displacement of 1 million people, an ethnic cleansing operation on a larger scale than the Nakba,” Sweeney stated on his X handle.

He rejected claims that the strike was accidental, emphasizing that his team was wearing marked “PRESS” vests and had permission from the Lebanese Army to film.

“I have absolutely no doubt that this was deliberate. Despite claims there were no warnings ahead of the strike and no notifications sent to the Lebanese Army who allowed us to film,” Sweeney said.

The journalist also criticized international backers of Israel, accusing Western powers of enabling the violence.

“It is the western powers who provide political and military support for Israel, arming it to the teeth to carry out genocide in Gaza and ethnic cleansing here in Lebanon,” he said. “They are not simply complicit, but active participants and should be held accountable.”

Russia’s Foreign Ministry condemned the attack. Spokesperson Maria Zakharova stated that the strike “cannot be called accidental,” noting that over 200 journalists have been killed in Gaza since the regional conflict began.

While the IDF claimed the bridge was a “Hezbollah crossing” and that warnings had been posted online, Sweeney said no direct notification reached either the journalists or the Lebanese Army units securing the area.

Despite the near-fatal attack, Sweeney vowed to continue reporting from the region.

“If Israel thinks today’s strike will silence us and keep us out of the field, they are very, very mistaken,” he concluded.

President Bola Tinubu has called on Muslims across Nigeria to use the Eid-el-Fitr celebrations to pray for peace, prosperity, and national unity.

The message was conveyed on Thursday through a statement by his Special Adviser on Information and Strategy, Bayo Onanuga. Tinubu urged Nigerian Muslims to rededicate themselves to the principles of Ramadan, which emphasise piety, empathy, and harmony among people.

“As Muslims worldwide celebrate Eid-el-Fitr, marking the end of Ramadan, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has congratulated the Muslim faithful in Nigeria, urging renewed commitment to the nation and humanity,” the statement read.

“We have a lot to draw from the noble lessons of Ramadan, especially at a time like this. We must continue to abide by the virtues of piety, selflessness, perseverance, kindness and compassion beyond this period,” Tinubu added.

The President also encouraged Muslims to reach out to the needy, regardless of their faith, as a demonstration of unity and solidarity.

This call comes as the nation prepares to mark the end of Ramadan, a period of reflection, fasting, and spiritual renewal for Muslims worldwide.

By Sabiu Abdullahi

Fresh security concerns have surfaced in Washington after unidentified drones were seen flying over a sensitive United States military installation.

The Washington Post reported that the drones were detected above Fort McNair, a facility where Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth are accommodated. The report cited three individuals who were briefed on the development.

Officials have not determined where the drones came ⁠from, the report said, citing two of the people familiar with the matter, leaving questions over their origin unanswered.

The situation has led to internal discussions within government circles about whether Rubio and Hegseth should be relocated from the base due to safety worries. Despite those concerns, both officials are still at the facility. A senior administration official confirmed this, according to the report.

The newspaper also noted that the U.S. military has increased its surveillance of potential threats. This comes amid heightened alert levels linked to the ongoing conflict involving the United States and Israel against Iran.

Reuters reported it could not independently verify the development at the time.

Meanwhile, both the Pentagon and the U.S. State Department have not issued official statements on the matter. When approached by the Washington Post, Chief Pentagon spokesperson Sean Parnell declined to provide details.

“The department cannot comment on the secretary’s (Hegseth’s) movements for security ⁠reasons, and reporting on such movements is grossly irresponsible,” he told the Post.

By Uzair Adam

The Kano State Government has intensified efforts to address urban congestion and improve commercial infrastructure through fresh consultations with market stakeholders on the proposed development of a modern market in Dangwauro.

This was disclosed in a statement signed by Murtala Shehu Umar, Director of Public Enlightenment at the Kano State Ministry of Land and Physical Planning, who said the engagement reflects the government’s commitment to inclusive planning and sustainable urban development.

The statement noted that the initiative is being driven under the leadership of Governor Abba Kabir Yusuf, as part of broader measures to decongest existing markets and enhance trading conditions across the state.

According to the release, the State Commissioner for Land and Physical Planning, Abduljabbar Mohammed Umar, led a high-level meeting with leaders of Yankaba Vegetable Market and Na’ibawa Yan Lemo (Fruit Market).

The consultation, it said, is a key step toward establishing a well-organised and efficient market structure in Dangwauro.

The discussions centred on gathering input from traders and stakeholders to ensure the proposed market meets their operational needs.

Issues such as improved layout, accessibility, and a more conducive business environment were highlighted during the engagement.

Market leaders, the statement added, commended the government for adopting a participatory approach and expressed support for the project, pledging their cooperation toward its successful implementation.

The government maintained that the initiative is part of its broader agenda to promote economic growth, modernise trading hubs, and improve livelihoods for traders in the state.

By Sabiu Abdullahi

Former Arsenal striker and ex-Liberian President, George Weah, has faulted the Confederation of African Football (CAF) over its decision to withdraw the 2025 Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) title from Senegal and award it to Morocco.

In a statement dated March 18, 2026, Weah argued that the decision contradicts established football rules. He stressed that referees hold ultimate authority during matches and that outcomes decided on the pitch should remain valid.

“In football, the Laws of the Game are clear: the referee on the pitch is the final authority on decisions made during the match. Once play is allowed to continue and the match is completed, the result obtained on the field must stand,” he said.

Weah also cited CAF regulations and FIFA rules to support his position. According to him, both frameworks recognise the referee’s control over match proceedings.

“Under the applicable rules of the Confederation of African Football (CAF), match officials have full authority during the game,” he added.

Quoting the Laws of the Game, he said:
“The referee has full authority to enforce the Laws of the Game in connection with the match to which he has been appointed, and his decisions on facts connected with play are final.”

Weah referred to the AFCON final between Senegal and Morocco. He explained that the referee allowed play to continue after Senegal’s walk-off. The match went on to extra time and produced a result on the field.

He noted that the referee’s post-match report recorded a stoppage rather than a forfeiture. The report also recommended sanctions for incidents during the game.

Based on this, Weah maintained that CAF’s later ruling should not override the referee’s authority.

“For this reason, the subsequent decision by CAF committee, taken after the match had already been concluded, should not override the authority exercised by the referee during the game in keeping with the Laws of the Game – Law 5,” he said.

He warned against allowing off-field decisions to determine results after matches have ended.

“Football must be decided on the pitch, not re-decided after the final whistle,” he stated.

Weah further argued that there was no sporting basis to cancel a completed match. He cautioned that such actions could weaken trust in football governance.

“There is therefore no sporting justification to nullify a match that was completed in accordance with the referee’s authority and the Laws of the Game otherwise the beautiful game will head down a slippery slope where committee room officials and not match officials will be making post match rulings to override referees on-field decisions like penalties, offside and red cards.

Where will it end?”

The former Ballon d’Or winner said the decision had damaged the image of African football.

“This decision has further scarred and blemished African football, undermining confidence in the fairness, consistency, and integrity of football on the continent,” he said.

He called on the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) and other relevant bodies to take action.

“I call on  the court of Arbitration for Sports(CAS) and other relevant authorities to move decisively so that this travesty does not stand.”

Weah also denied claims circulating on social media that he supported CAF’s disciplinary action against Senegal.

“I also want to use this opportunity to clarify that social media posts widely circulating claiming that I support the decision by CAF Disciplinary Committee against Senegal is blatantly false.

All those circulating my image and attaching same to such fallacious statements are advised to refrain.”

By Sabiu Abdullahi

The United States Director of National Intelligence, Tulsi Gabbard, has stated that Iran did not present an active nuclear threat at the time American forces carried out strikes on the country.

Her position challenges a key reason advanced by former President Donald Trump for the military action. Mr Trump had cited what he described as an imminent danger from Iran.

In written testimony submitted to the Senate intelligence committee, Ms Gabbard said Iran had not taken steps to rebuild its nuclear programme after it was damaged in a joint US-Israeli operation in June 2025.

“As a result of Operation Midnight Hammer, Iran’s nuclear enrichment program was obliterated. There have been no efforts since then to try to rebuild their enrichment capability,” Ms Gabbard said in the testimony to the Senate intelligence committee.

However, she did not include this conclusion in her oral presentation to lawmakers. When questioned by a Democratic senator, she explained that time constraints prevented her from presenting the full contents of her written submission. She did not dispute the findings.

Mr Trump has repeatedly defended the strikes, insisting they were necessary due to an “imminent threat” from Iran. After the operation in June 2025, he said US forces had “obliterated” Iranian nuclear facilities. He later claimed the country was only weeks away from producing a nuclear weapon.

Many analysts have disagreed with that assessment. Their views also contrast with ongoing diplomatic efforts aimed at restoring a nuclear agreement with Tehran.

During her remarks to senators, Ms Gabbard acknowledged that recent attacks had significantly weakened Iran. She referenced major developments, including the killing of former supreme leader Ali Khamenei. Despite this, she maintained that the country’s government structures were still functioning.

Earlier in her political career as a congresswoman, Ms Gabbard had opposed military action against Iran.

Meanwhile, Joe Kent, a senior aide to Ms Gabbard, resigned earlier this week. He argued there was no “imminent threat” from Iran. Mr Kent, who previously served as a counterterrorism director, alleged that he and other officials were not given the opportunity to present their concerns to Mr Trump.

Mr Trump dismissed the criticism. He said he had always considered Mr Kent “weak on security” and added that individuals who did not see Iran as a threat had no place in his administration.

Reports on Thursday indicated that the FBI has opened an investigation into Mr Kent over claims that he disclosed classified information.

In an interview with commentator Tucker Carlson, Mr Kent said key officials were excluded from the decision-making process that led to the strikes.

“A good deal of key decision makers were not allowed to come and express their opinion to the president,” he told Mr Carlson.

“There wasn’t a robust debate,” he said in the interview.

He also supported Ms Gabbard’s earlier assessment on Iran’s nuclear capability.

“No. They weren’t three weeks ago when this started, and they weren’t in June either,” he said, referring to claims that Iran was close to building nuclear weapons.

Mr Kent further alleged that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and other officials lobbied Mr Trump directly, often relying on information that had not been verified by US intelligence.

“When we would hear what they were saying, it didn’t reflect intelligence channels,” Mr Kent said.

He also recounted a conversation with conservative activist Charlie Kirk before his death, stating: “He looked me in the eye and said, ‘Joe, stop us from getting into a war with Iran’.”

Mr Kent went on to suggest, without providing evidence, that Israel may have been involved in Mr Kirk’s death. His remarks, along with claims about an “Israeli lobby” influencing US policy, have attracted criticism from several groups who described the statements as anti-Semitic.