Month: December 2024

By Faizah Suleiman

In Kano State, phone theft has become more than a petty crime. It’s a nightmare for residents who can barely go about their day without clutching their phones nervously. From bustling markets to quiet streets, no place seems safe anymore. The once vibrant and lively atmosphere of Kano is now shadowed by fear as criminals prey on unsuspecting victims.

But why has phone theft spiralled out of control, and what can we do about it? For many residents, phone theft stories are no longer distant tales but personal experiences. Abdullahi Musa, a trader at Kurmi Market, recalls how his phone was snatched in broad daylight.

“I was talking to a customer when two men on a motorcycle came out of nowhere. Before I could react, my phone was gone, and they disappeared into the crowd,” he said.

Sadly, Abdullahi’s story isn’t unique. It’s part of an alarming trend that affects students, workers, and businesspeople alike. These criminals are smart, fast, and ruthless, and they’ve turned Kano into a hunting ground. You might wonder why this is happening so often in Kano. Well, the reasons aren’t far-fetched.

First, economic hardship has pushed many young people into crime. With unemployment rates soaring, some see phone theft as a way to survive. A recent survey showed that 78% of Kano residents feel unsafe using their phones in public. This fear isn’t paranoia. It’s a reality.

Then, there’s the issue of the thriving black market. Places like Sabon Gari are notorious for dealing in stolen phones. These criminals know they can easily sell a stolen phone, often within hours.

Losing a phone isn’t just about losing a device; it’s about losing a lifeline. For many in Kano, their phones hold contacts, bank details, business deals, and even educational materials. A lost phone means a significant setback.

“I saved for months to buy that phone,” lamented Fatima Ahmed, a university student. “When it was stolen, I didn’t just lose my device; I lost my school notes, assignments, and peace of mind.”

It’s a vicious cycle. The more phones are stolen, the more fear spreads, and the more cautious people become, yet the thieves always seem one step ahead.

To their credit, the authorities haven’t been sitting idle. The Kano State Police Command has ramped up hotspot operations, recovering hundreds of stolen phones in 2024 alone. There’s also been a push for awareness campaigns, encouraging residents to secure their phones and activate tracking features like IMEI.

But there’s a problem. Many victims feel the response isn’t fast enough, and even when thieves are caught, they often face light punishments. This lack of consequences only emboldens the criminals.

So, how do we stop this? It will take the collaboration of everyone: government, police, communities, and individuals.

• We need more community policing. Vigilante groups working with the police can monitor neighbourhoods and markets.

• Harsher penalties must be imposed on those caught stealing phones. If the punishment is severe enough, it could deter others.

• The government should clamp down on illegal sales of secondhand phones. If stolen phones can’t be sold, the incentive to steal them disappears.

• As residents, we also have a role to play. We can make a difference by avoiding phone use in crowded areas, enabling phone tracking, and reporting suspicious activity.

Phone theft in Kano is more than just an inconvenience. It’s a threat to our security and peace of mind. It’s time we took a stand. The next time you see someone holding their phone tightly, remember: it’s not just a gadget they’re protecting; it’s a part of their life. Let’s work together to make Kano safe again.

Faizah Sulaiman wrote from Kano via suleimanfaizah01@gmail.com.

By Mujahid Ibrahim

This life has a strange way of teaching lessons we never expect. To be precise, for at least two years, now, I had grown accustomed to the comfort of moving around the city in my little car. This has already become my everyday norm. But as petrol prices began to rise in the country, as many other fellow lower class citizens, I found myself reevaluating my choices. Moving by car was sometimes cheaper than hiring an okada or a Keke Napep but unnecessary trips were adding up. This pushed us to begin to consider using a bicycle; cost-effective, healthy, and, I thought, practical.

On this particular evening of 22/12/2024, a friend Saifullah had invited me to a dinner in his house, The venue was just about 3 kilometers away, and I decided to leave the car behind and ride my bicycle instead. “Why not?” I thought. “It’s a short distance, and I’ll save money on fuel.” Little did I know, that simple decision would lead to a night I would never forget.

The dinner was delightful—filled with warm conversations with associates, and moments of reflection.

I left there around 8:00pm, I decided to stop by a mini-market at Wunti to pick up a few essentials before heading home.

My mind, however, was already preoccupied with excitement. Earlier that day, an interview with Prof. IBK by Bello Sagir Imam had been released, and I couldn’t wait to listen to it.

Pedaling through the busy streets around 8:30 p.m., I felt the urge to play the interview right away so that by the time I reached home, I reasoned, I would have finished listening and could dive straight into reading a book gifted to me by a dear friend, Tea Isah. It was an insightful work by Ibn Rushd on the relationship between science, religion, and philosophy.

As I passed beneath the Wunti Flyover, currently under construction, I stopped under the bridge to take out my phone and earphones. The area wasn’t quiet; the bustle of vehicles and pedestrians surrounded me. I felt a sense of safety in the activity, but it was short-lived. Suddenly, the sound of a motorcycle pierced through the hum of the evening.

A brand-new white Moto B sped from behind me, its riders veering dangerously close. Before I could react, the motorcycle screeched to a halt, and two men dismounted swiftly.

“Give us your phone!” one of them barked, his voice sharp and filled with menace.

Startled, I looked up, my heart racing. One of them took a step closer, revealing a knife glinting in the dim light. “If you resist, we’ll stab you,” he threatened. The weight of his words left no room for defiance. ‘Ba zan zura ido yaro karami, ya burma min wuka ba.’ I handed over my phone without resisting at the moment.

But they weren’t done. “The bag,” the other demanded, motioning to the small bag I was holding from my shopping trip. I hesitated for a second too long, and the knife came closer. Without another word, I surrendered the bag, my mind racing with a mix of surprise and disbelief.

In moments, they mounted the motorcycle and sped off through the bustling street, heading toward Gwallaga Juma’at Mosque and approaching the Nasarawa Roundabout.

A kind-hearted bike rider nearby noticed what had happened and offered to help. He tried to chase them, but they escaped into the chaos of the night. I stood there, behind the flyover, feeling a mix of helplessness and gratitude to Allah. Though shaken, I was unharmed. My phone, my bag, and my essentials were gone, but my spirit remained intact. I kept pronouncing “Yaa Allah” and repeatedly saying it several times.

What else should I do? I pedaled home in silence, the incident replayed in my mind. I felt anger, sadness, and frustration, but also a growing sense of determination and thankful to Allah for saving me. This wasn’t just about “me”. How many others had faced similar dangers on these streets? I don’t know. How many more would, if nothing changed?

To the Bauchi State Government, under Gov. Bala Muhammad, the “Modern Bauchi City” deserves better. Rising petrol prices all over the country is already pushing many of us to make such tough decisions as trekking long distances, or riding bicycles as in my own case. However, those choices shouldn’t expose us to danger. Even before the completion of the project, we need safer streets, better lighting in vulnerable areas, and a stronger presence of law enforcement. These flyovers are meant to a symbol of progress, not a haven for crime.

To those in authority, especially the security forces, I urge: please pay attention to these areas especially during night hours. To my fellow citizens, I plead: be vigilant, monitor strength movements around you, stop using phones while on streets, unless it becomes necessary and look out for one another. And to those who find themselves in moments of loss or fear, remember; resilience is our greatest strength. Trust Almighty Allah only after doing your best.

That night under the bridge, Uhmm! I lost possessions, but I gained a purpose. Alhamdulillah that it was not easy for them in my case.

Mujahid Ibrahim wrote in from Bauchi and can be reached via littlemujahid4gmail.com.

By Sabiu Abdullahi

The Nneka Chidoka Outreach Program (NCOP) has embarked on a nationwide campaign to advocate for increased funding for cancer care in Nigeria’s 2025 budget.

With a staggering 124,000 new cancer cases reported annually, the current lack of adequate funding has resulted in many Nigerians being denied access to life-saving treatment.

Despite efforts by the Federal Ministry of Health, including the Cancer Health Fund (CHF) and the National Cancer Access Partnership (NCAP), limited funding and infrastructure gaps have restricted the benefits to only a fraction of cancer patients.

To address this, NCOP is collaborating with the Ministry and the National Institute for Cancer Research and Treatment (NICRAT) to urge lawmakers to allocate more funds for cancer care during the 2025 budget deliberations.

The campaign’s key objectives include securing ₦25 billion to transition the Cancer Health Fund into the Catastrophic Health Insurance Fund for sustainable cancer care, closing the ₦97 billion funding gap for completing six Cancer Centers of Excellence under the National Oncology Initiative, and expanding funding for NCAP to ensure more Nigerians have access to affordable cancer medications.

Osita Chidoka, Founder of NCOP, noted the importance of collective action, saying “Cancer is a battle we must fight together. We are urging all Nigerians to take a stand by signing this petition.

“With your support, we can push for meaningful investments in cancer care and give hope to thousands of families.”

To support the campaign, individuals can sign the petition and share the message on social media using the hashtag #FundCancerCare2025.By working together, NCOP aims to ensure that no Nigerian is left behind in the fight against cancer.

The organization is committed to transforming Nigeria’s healthcare landscape and improving access to cancer care through early diagnosis, advocacy, and funding support.

With the help of Nigerians, NCOP hopes to make a significant impact and bring about positive change in the lives of those affected by cancer.

By Usman Muhammad Salihu

Genotype incompatibility continues to disrupt lives and relationships across northern Nigeria, where premarital medical testing is not yet mandatory. The emotional and financial toll it takes on couples, families, and communities cannot be overstated. 

I recently encountered two striking reminders of its devastating impact. First, I came across a trending wedding invitation card on Facebook. What stood out wasn’t the design or details but the heartbreaking update: the wedding had been cancelled due to genotype incompatibility. 

Shortly after, while scrolling through WhatsApp statuses, I saw my sister and classmate, Ummu Kulsum, express her frustration in just a few words: “Ya Allah, why does all this genotype matter?” Her lament instantly reminded me of my brother’s ordeal, where his marriage was called off barely two days before the wedding for the same reason.

These instances are not isolated. They represent a growing crisis fueled by a lack of awareness and delayed action. Many couples only undergo genotype testing at the final stages of their wedding preparations, often when financial and emotional investments are at their peak. 

Discovering genetic incompatibility at such a late stage forces painful decisions: risk the health of future children or cancel the union altogether. In northern Nigeria, where premarital testing is not yet compulsory, such stories are alarmingly common. 

While no religion or culture explicitly prioritises marriage over health, societal practices and insufficient awareness often lead to preventable heartbreaks. Religious and cultural leaders uniquely advocate for early genotype testing as an essential part of marriage preparations.

Sickle cell disease (SCD), prevalent in Nigeria, is one of the most severe outcomes of incompatible genotypes. Couples with AS-AS or AS-SS combinations risk passing this life-altering condition to their children. Living with SCD involves chronic pain, frequent hospital visits, and significant financial strain—all of which could be avoided through proper testing and awareness.

The time has come for a societal shift. Policymakers must work towards making premarital genotype testing compulsory in all northern states. Religious and traditional leaders should advocate for such measures and integrate genotype counselling into premarital counselling sessions.

Healthcare providers and educational institutions must also increase efforts to educate the public on genetic compatibility. Awareness campaigns can normalise discussions about genotype testing, emphasising its role in building healthy families and preventing avoidable heartbreaks.

For families like mine, the trauma of cancelled weddings due to genotype incompatibility is a painful memory. The financial losses and emotional distress are entirely avoidable with early testing and informed decisions. My brother’s experience and countless others highlight the urgent need for collective action.

Love is an essential foundation for marriage, but so is the responsibility to ensure a healthy future for one’s family. By prioritising early genotype testing and raising awareness, we can prevent the heartbreak of cancelled weddings and the lifelong struggles associated with genetic disorders.

The solution is in our hands. We must act now—for love, health, and future generations.

Usman Muhammad Salihu is a PRNigeria Fellow and wrote in from Jos, Nigeria. He can be reached at muhammadu5363@gmail.com.

By Anas Abbas

In a recent briefing, the Federal Capital Territory Emergency Management Department (FEMD) revealed that 2024 saw the successful rescue of 105 individuals from various building collapse incidents across the territory.

Engr. Abdulrahman Mohammed, the Acting Director General of FEMD, shared these statistics during a media conference held yesterday in Abuja.

The reported collapses occurred in several locations, including Prince and Princess Estate, Guzape District, Garki 2, Kubwa, and Sabon Lugbe along the Airport Road.

Mohammed highlighted that the department’s efforts not only focused on building collapses but also addressed other emergencies such as fire outbreaks, flooding, and earth tremors, while distributing relief materials to affected individuals.

Reflecting on the department’s activities over the past year, Mohammed noted that FEMD successfully saved approximately 3,500 lives through 165 calls made to its emergency toll-free number, 112.

He provided a detailed account of their search and rescue operations: “In 2024, we rescued 75 individuals from flood-related incidents. Unfortunately, we did record one fatality due to flooding in Angwan Hakimi, Orozo, within the Abuja Municipal Area Council. To alleviate the impact of heavy rains, we barricaded the slip road at Galadimawa interchange on June 25, reopening it on November 17.”

In terms of building collapses, he confirmed that while 105 people were rescued, there were four tragic fatalities. The incidents primarily took place at the aforementioned locations.

FEMD also reported significant success in managing fire outbreaks, rescuing 1,230 individuals without any loss of life. Notable incidents included fires at Old Karu Market, a fitness center in Gwarinpa, and various residential properties.

In a separate incident, FEMD officials and police intervened to prevent a suicide attempt on a mast atop Katampe Hill. Their quick response showcased their commitment to community safety.

The department also addressed concerns regarding an earth tremor that affected Mpape, Katampe, and parts of Maitama Extension, which left over 2,000 residents in distress. A comprehensive report on this incident was submitted to the Minister of the Federal Capital Territory.

On the issue of road safety, FEMD reported rescuing 89 individuals from road crashes, although three fatalities were recorded. In response to these incidents, they launched their “Operation Eagle Eye” campaign in collaboration with the Federal Road Safety Corps. This initiative aims to educate commercial drivers at motor parks across the FCT on safe driving practices during the busy ember months.

By Uzair Adam

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has reiterated his administration’s unwavering commitment to implementing tax reforms, emphasizing their importance for Nigeria’s economic transformation.

The Daily Reality reports that the president made this assertion during his first presidential media chat on Monday night in Lagos State.

The proposed reforms, encapsulated in several bills before the National Assembly, include the Nigeria Tax Bill, Nigeria Tax Administration Bill, Nigeria Revenue Service Establishment Bill, and the Joint Revenue Board Establishment Bill.

Despite facing backlash, particularly from Northern leaders, and prompting calls for further consultation, Tinubu defended the reforms as being pro-poor and aimed at restructuring outdated colonial tax structures.

“Tax reform is here to stay,” Tinubu stated, adding, “In today’s economy, we cannot continue to rely on outdated systems.

“The essence of these reforms is to eliminate colonial-based assumptions in our tax environment. The vulnerable will not be subjected to taxation.”

Addressing concerns about the controversial Value-Added Tax sharing model, the President expressed his willingness to engage in negotiations but insisted that the reforms would proceed.

“Tax matters are subjects of debate, reviews, and negotiations until consensus is reached,” he said.

Tinubu also remarked that good leadership requires decisive actions at critical moments.

“The hallmark of a good leader is the ability to do what you have to do when it needs to be done. That is my philosophy,” he added.

The proposed tax reforms aim to create a fairer tax system, though Tinubu acknowledged that they might not be universally accepted.

By Uzair Adam

President Bola Ahmed Tinubu has reaffirmed the necessity of his administration’s decision to remove the fuel subsidy, describing it as an unavoidable step to secure Nigeria’s economic stability.

During his first presidential media chat on Monday night, Tinubu maintained, “I have no regrets whatever removing subsidies. It was necessary.”

The President explained that the subsidy system was unsustainable and akin to jeopardizing the nation’s future for immediate gratification.

“We were not investing; we were just deceiving ourselves. The reform was necessary. We cannot have expenditures we don’t have revenue for,” he stated, urging Nigerians to embrace fiscal discipline and prudent financial management.

“Cut your coat according to your size,” Tinubu advised, adding that the removal was imperative to ensure a sustainable future for upcoming generations.

He acknowledged the challenges posed by the reform, including resistance from smugglers, and emphasized the need for stringent enforcement and structural adjustments.

“I can see smugglers fighting back,” Tinubu remarked, vowing to address these challenges through necessary reforms and strong measures.

The President also extended his condolences to the families of victims of recent stampede incidents at a charity event, calling for improved organization and contingency planning to avoid similar tragedies.

“It is sad that people are not respected or are abused in situations like this. If you don’t have enough to give, don’t publicise it,” he said, urging event organisers to prioritise safety and crowd control.

Tinubu reiterated his administration’s commitment to making difficult but essential decisions, asserting, “No matter how you phase it, you still have to meet the bill.”

By Adamkolo Mohammed Ibrahim

The Truth Behind Nigeria’s Controversial Tax Reform Bill

Professor Taiwo Oyedele, Chairman of the Presidential Committee on Fiscal Policy and Tax Reforms, recently claimed that 90% of Nigerians support the contentious tax reform bills currently before the National Assembly. This claim is not only misleading but also contradicts the palpable opposition across various sectors of the country. As a university lecturer, researcher, public policy critic, and advocate of public accountability, I find it imperative to refute these unfounded assertions with facts and context.

Professor Oyedele and his team have lauded the proposed tax reform bill as a transformative framework, but it has sparked nationwide outrage, including on social media platforms. Far from the purported overwhelming support, the bill faces staunch opposition from key stakeholders across Nigeria, particularly in the 19 states in northern Nigeria. Among those voicing their discontent are the 19 northern governors, traditional rulers such as emirs, religious organisations, youth groups, business associations, and a myriad of concerned citizens, both in real life and on social media platforms.

Nigeria’s Vice President, Senator Kashim Shettima, who also chairs the National Economic Council (NEC), offered a particularly significant perspective. In alignment with the collective stance of northern governors (drawing from his deep understanding of the region as a proud son of the northeast of Nigeria) and other national stakeholders, he emphasised the importance of ensuring inclusivity and fairness in the proposed tax reform process. 

The Vice President firmly advised against submitting the bill to the National Assembly without wider consultations. During one of NEC’s monthly sessions, a unanimous decision was reached: the bill should be halted to ensure no region or demographic is marginalised in our democratic process. Despite this well-articulated stance, the President disregarded this advice and pushed ahead with the submission of the bill. This move has understandably deepened mistrust and resentment.

Critics argue that the tax reform bill is structured to disproportionately benefit Lagos State to the detriment of 35 other states and the Federal Capital Territory. For northern governors, this directly threatens their ability to sustain basic governance functions, including the payment of salaries and provision of essential services. Governor Babagana Zulum of Borno State is one of the most vocal opponents, warning that the bill if passed, would cripple northern states economically.

Such criticisms are not baseless. Deep inequalities mark Nigeria’s economic landscape, and any policy perceived to exacerbate these disparities inevitably meets with resistance. The tax reform bill appears to reinforce these fears, offering no clear mechanisms to balance its purported benefits with the realities of Nigeria’s diverse socio-economic terrain.

Questionable Survey Claims

Professor Oyedele’s assertion of a 90% approval rating for the bill demands rigorous scrutiny. According to his statement, the survey involved over 3,000 participants, a mix of online and offline respondents, with approval rates ranging from 76% among passive readers to 100% among in-person attendees. These figures raise more questions than they answer.

Who exactly were the survey respondents? What methodology was employed? How representative was the sample of Nigeria’s diverse population? What strategies were used for data collection and analysis? These critical details remain conspicuously absent, leaving the legitimacy of the survey in serious doubt.

Nigerians deserve transparency in policymaking. If this survey indeed reflects national sentiment, Professor Oyedele and his committee should publish the raw data, methodology, and results for independent verification. If they have not done so, this can only be interpreted as an attempt to mislead the public using propagandistic executive intimidation and push through an agenda that lacks popular support.

The Case for Wider Consultation

The NEC’s earlier recommendation to halt the bill and engage in broader consultations was wise and democratic. Policymaking in a pluralistic society like Nigeria requires inclusivity, transparency, and sensitivity to regional and socio-economic disparities. By bypassing these principles, the federal government risks deepening the divisions that have long plagued the nation.

Wider consultation is not just a procedural formality but a necessity. It allows for the incorporation of diverse perspectives, ensuring that no part of the country feels short-changed. Given the widespread criticism of the bill, particularly from regions like the North that stand to lose the most, the government’s failure to heed this advice represents a glaring lapse in leadership.

Furthermore, President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s policy direction, particularly concerning the contentious tax reform bill, raises critical questions about his government’s approach to governance and inclusivity, especially regarding the northern region of Nigeria. It is a region that not only demonstrated overwhelming support for his candidacy in the 2023 general election but also provided the majority of the votes that secured his presidency.

In the 2023 presidential election, President Tinubu garnered a significant 8,794,726 votes, with the northern region contributing the bulk of this figure. Northern voters cast over 4.9 million votes — approximately 55.7% of his total votes — in his favour. These numbers highlight the region’s decisive role in his electoral victory. Yet, it is disheartening to observe the implementation of policies that appear inimical to the socio-economic interests of this same region.

The adage “do not bite the finger that feeds you” is not only a moral maxim but a practical guide for leadership in a diverse democracy like Nigeria. Unfortunately, recent government actions, particularly the insistence on the controversial tax reform bill, seem to disregard this wisdom. The northern region, often referred to as the agricultural and cultural heartland of the nation, stands to bear the brunt of these policies. Stakeholders, including northern governors, traditional rulers, and socio-political groups, have consistently voiced their opposition, warning that the bill could exacerbate regional inequities and economic hardships.

Rather than recognising and addressing these legitimate concerns, the administration appears determined to forge ahead. This approach not only undermines the trust of a region that played a pivotal role in President Tinubu’s electoral success but also risks alienating key stakeholders whose support is crucial for national stability. It is worth noting that governance is a reciprocal relationship; the trust and support of the people should be met with policies that prioritise their welfare and reflect their collective aspirations.

Every action or inaction in politics has consequences, and the grievances of the northern region should not be underestimated. Leaders must remember that political capital is not an endless resource; it must be replenished through equitable and inclusive governance. President Tinubu’s administration must demonstrate its commitment to Nigeria’s unity and progress by re-evaluating policies that could harm the very citizens whose votes propelled him to power.

The northern region’s contribution to President Tinubu’s mandate was not a token gesture but a profound expression of trust and hope in his leadership. To erode that trust through policies perceived as neglectful or exploitative is to undermine the very foundation of the democratic pact. As the government moves forward, it must prioritise consultation, transparency, and equity to ensure that all regions of the country, especially the North, feel represented and valued. Anything less would not only be a betrayal of the region’s support but a potential threat to the unity and stability of the nation.

The Way Forward

To restore public trust and ensure equitable governance, the Federal Government must take the following steps:

1. Publish the Survey Data: Nigerians have the right to scrutinise the data underpinning claims of popular support for the bill. Transparency is non-negotiable.
2. Engage Stakeholders: Governors, traditional rulers, religious leaders, youth organisations, business associations, students, and other demographics must be actively involved in refining the bill. Their insights are crucial for crafting a policy that benefits all Nigerians.
3. Reassess the Bill: The tax reform must be revisited to address its perceived regional biases. Mechanisms should be introduced to ensure that no state or region is disproportionately disadvantaged.
4. Strengthen Regional Equity: Any reform should prioritise clear, open, transparent, unambiguous, and sincere equitable distribution of resources and revenue, balancing the needs of economically vibrant states like Lagos with those of less developed regions.
5. Promote Public Dialogue: The government should organise town hall meetings and public forums across all geopolitical zones to educate citizens about the bill and solicit their input. Relying solely on the National Assembly’s public hearings will not be sufficient to ensure broad-based participation and understanding.

Therefore, the claim that 90% of Nigerians support the tax reform bill distorts reality. The widespread opposition from across Nigeria, including key voices in northern governance, traditional institutions, and civil society, underscores the contentious nature of this legislation. Rather than pushing ahead with a deeply flawed policy, the Federal Government must prioritise inclusivity, transparency, and equity in its approach to fiscal reform.

Cherry-picked survey results, lofty rhetoric, or political propaganda will not silence Nigerians. Democracy thrives on accountability, and the people deserve nothing less than policies that genuinely reflect their collective will and serve their common good. Professor Oyedele and his committee must heed this call, for the integrity of Nigeria’s democratic process and the future of its fiscal stability depends on it.

Adamkolo Mohammed Ibrahim, a Lecturer at the Department of Mass Communication, University of Maiduguri, wrote in from Pompommari Sabon-Fegi, Damaturu, Yobe State, and can be reached via adamkolo@unimaid.edu.ng.

By Sabiu Abdullahi

By Abdullahi Mukhtar Algasgaini

The Kaduna State Peace Commission has declared 2024 as a peaceful year free from all kinds of violence.KSPC’s executive vice-chairman, Sale Momale, disclosed this during a meeting jointly organised by the commission and the U.S. Institute of Peace (USIP), facilitated by AID Foundation in Kaduna.

He said there was no single record of conflict between herders and farmers, and there was no politically-induced violence even during the local government and by-elections of Kaduna.Mr Momale added that there was no violent confrontation bordering chieftaincy disputes or violence over boundary matters.

“We salute and appreciate the people of Kaduna state for making this possible, including our various stakeholders that have worked very hard to make this a practical reality.

“The major challenge in terms of peace and security are the activities of criminal groups and gangs, which are a national and regional dilemma in which the worst affected states in the country are in the North-West geopolitical zone,” he said.

Mr Momale explained that Katsina and Kaduna, as well as Zamfara and Niger, were having the highest issues related to criminal activities by bandits and other associated militant groups.

Mr Momale said despite these issues, the commission has been engaging the state and federal governments and was hopeful that the issues would be addressed soon.

He urged faith-based organisations, NGOs, and the Network of Peace Journalists to collaborate with the commission to campaign to end banditry in Kaduna.

Mr Momale commended the government’s effort to bring peace to Birnin Gwari LGA, saying such efforts should be replicated in other council areas plagued by banditry.