By Anas Abbas
The controversy involving Senator Natasha Akpoti and the Nigerian Senate President has sparked significant discussion in the media. While it is important to cover matters of public interest, the extensive media attention on this controversy raises questions about the “oxygen of publicity” and its possible consequences.
Some say the media provides the “oxygen of publicity” to individuals or groups, granting them attention and visibility. This can be a double-edged sword. On one hand, media attention can bring important issues to the forefront and hold those in power accountable. On the other hand, excessive coverage can perpetuate sensationalism, distort facts, and create a culture of exploitation.
In the case of the Akpoti controversy, the media’s extensive reporting may be inadvertently fueling the issue. By constantly covering the controversy, the media may be giving the parties involved a sense of validation and attention, which could encourage them to continue their actions.
Ralph Akinfeleye, a professor at the University of Lagos, argues that sensationalist reporting can weaken society and have widespread negative consequences. He suggests that the media should prioritize responsible reporting and steer clear of sensationalism.
Given this, it is crucial for media organizations to reevaluate their approach to covering controversies such as the Akpoti issue. Instead of continuing sensationalism, they should emphasize balanced, factual reporting that prioritizes the public interest.
Perhaps it’s time for media organizations to step back and reflect on the impact of their reporting. By doing this, they can contribute to a more responsible and informed media landscape and enhance their reporting.
Anas Abbas is a mass communication student at Bayero University in Kano and can be reached at anasabbas2099@gmail.com.