• About Us
Wednesday, June 29, 2022
  • Login
The Daily Reality
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
    • All
    • Sports
    Poetifying the North: Six years of Poetic Wednesdays poetry revival

    Poetifying the North: Six years of Poetic Wednesdays poetry revival

    Monstrous Madrid face Liverpool in UCL final after eliminating Man City

    Monstrous Madrid face Liverpool in UCL final after eliminating Man City

    Transition of Tashe

    Transition of Tashe

    Ronaldo could leave Man United this Summer—Danny Mills

    Ronaldo could leave Man United this Summer—Danny Mills

    ‘RRR’ Review: A visually stunning, exhilarating epic

    ‘RRR’ Review: A visually stunning, exhilarating epic

    Singer, Rema, begs ASUU to call off strike

    Singer, Rema, begs ASUU to call off strike

    World Cup Qualifier: Federal civil servants close from work at 1 pm ahead of Nigeria vs Ghana clash

    World Cup Qualifier: Federal civil servants close from work at 1 pm ahead of Nigeria vs Ghana clash

    Angel Di Maria vacates PSG this season

    Angel Di Maria vacates PSG this season

    Ronaldo, Osaka and Us: Between grit and rethinking

    Ronaldo, Osaka and Us: Between grit and rethinking

  • Local
  • Education
  • International
  • Kannywood
  • Entertainment
  • Religion
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Entertainment
    • All
    • Sports
    Poetifying the North: Six years of Poetic Wednesdays poetry revival

    Poetifying the North: Six years of Poetic Wednesdays poetry revival

    Monstrous Madrid face Liverpool in UCL final after eliminating Man City

    Monstrous Madrid face Liverpool in UCL final after eliminating Man City

    Transition of Tashe

    Transition of Tashe

    Ronaldo could leave Man United this Summer—Danny Mills

    Ronaldo could leave Man United this Summer—Danny Mills

    ‘RRR’ Review: A visually stunning, exhilarating epic

    ‘RRR’ Review: A visually stunning, exhilarating epic

    Singer, Rema, begs ASUU to call off strike

    Singer, Rema, begs ASUU to call off strike

    World Cup Qualifier: Federal civil servants close from work at 1 pm ahead of Nigeria vs Ghana clash

    World Cup Qualifier: Federal civil servants close from work at 1 pm ahead of Nigeria vs Ghana clash

    Angel Di Maria vacates PSG this season

    Angel Di Maria vacates PSG this season

    Ronaldo, Osaka and Us: Between grit and rethinking

    Ronaldo, Osaka and Us: Between grit and rethinking

  • Local
  • Education
  • International
  • Kannywood
  • Entertainment
  • Religion
No Result
View All Result
The Daily Reality
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinion

More takeaway from the Kano Debate

Admin by Admin
14 July 2021
in Opinion
0
More takeaway from the Kano Debate
0
SHARES
44
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Abubakar A. Bukar

In an attempt to demystify what he regards as Salafists’ deification of Bukhari, ‘Jabbar ended up with this raw Rushdification of the Prophet (SAW). All these references and inferences of indecency attributed to the Prophet (wa’iyaz billah, except for the debate, very few knew that the profanity is such great in its filthiness) remind one of many passages in the Satanic Verse. To which, Kano cannot keep silent. To which, the North cannot be indifferent. Nay, nor the Muslim world as a whole. When Rushdie attempted, the Ummah reacted. No less when similarly caricatures oozed with the stench from Denmark. While France’s Charlie Hebdo got more than what it bargained. Of recent when Macron assented to such insanity, we’re all appalled and nearly went berserk in search of lines from Namangi’s Wakokin Imfiraji:

         Wa ya kai, wa yai kamarka?

         Wa ya san asali ya naka?

        Wa ya san matukar rabonka?

        Tun da Allah ya yabe ka,

        Duk wanda ya ki ka ma yi gaba

Where the honour of the Prophet is at stake, an average Muslim would accept being intolerant, antediluvian and worse descriptions far readily than expected in lieu of the desecration. The interrelation of the Prophet’s personality and its sanctity with a Muslim devout is beyond mere belief, obedience and homage. It’s about the latter’s existential significance. It is on this note the Muslim relates with any threat thus – which appears incomprehensible to non-Muslim. This signification is beautifully captured by the American anthropologist Saba Mahmoud in her engagement with Judith Butler. See Religious Reason and Secular Affect:…where she says, ‘the Aristotlean term schesis captures this living relation because of its heightened psychophysiological and emotional connotations and its emphasis on familiarity and intimacy as a necessary aspect of the relation.

What interests me in this iconophile tradition is not so much the image as the concept of relationality that binds the subject to the object of veneration. Those who profess love for the Prophet do not simply follow his advice and admonition to the umma (that exist in the form of the hadith) but also try to emulate how he dressed; what he ate; how he spoke to his friends and adversaries; how he slept, walked, and so on. These mimetic ways of realising the Prophet’s behaviour are lived not as commandments but as virtues where one wants to ingest as it were, the Prophet’s persona into oneself… Muhammad, in this understanding, is not simply a proper noun referring to a particular historical figure but the mark of a relation of similitude…  The sense of moral injury that emanates from such a relationship between the ethical subject and the figure of exemplarity (such as Muhammad) is quite distinct from one that the notion of blasphemy encodes. The notion of moral injury I am describing no doubt entails a sense of violation, but this violation emanates not from the judgment that “the law” has been  transgressed but from the perception that one’s being, grounded as it is in a relationship of dependency with the Prophet, has been shaken’.

And I think it is from this prism Bala Mohammed, former Trust columnist, wrote that where the Prophet is involved, we are fanatics or something of that import in his reaction to the Danish cartoons.

The Sheikh in question obviously feels so much saturated (if not intoxicated) with counter-argument that he severally warned his interlocutors not to send a “tiny” representative, which he would bulldoze in a matter of seconds. But they defied by seemingly playing out this logical David-Goliath with him. I have never heard of this Rijiyar-Lemu Jnr. beforehand. And since the Sheikh’s encounter with Alkasim Hotoro, one could notice his ill-preparedness for conventional debate; that he’s more well-exercised and blabbermouth only in the absence of an antagonist. In a word, he’s a disappointment to the usual assertiveness of dissident voice. This becomes clearer when one juxtaposes Tal’udis vs Ja’far Adams debate. You may argue that besides the clerical establishment, the government too is posed against the dissenting Sheikh, making it nearly impossible to win the card. The fact of the matter is that since Socrates and Milton, dissidents grapple in/with the same circumstances. It’s the power of their argument, the logicality of the presentation of their stand – which considers and surmounts their opponents’ in Millian fashion – that extricate and exonerate them at least in the view of current sympathisers and later generation of dispassionate examiners.

In all this, the biggest lesson is on the centrality of humility and sincerity in the acquisition and transmission of knowledge.

Similarly, I’d also felt our teacher shouldn’t have been the moderator in this debate. But upon listening through the 5 hours of exchanges, nothing could be fairer than Professor Salisu Shehu’s handling of the interlocking scenario. Partisan, yes he is, but I think he has ably transcended that with calmness and justice. After all, it was not a stark case of the Sufi-Salafi divide as many framed it to be, misleadingly. Among Sheikh Jabbar’s interrogators are representatives of Tijjaniya, Qadiriya, JIBWIS and Salafi.

Beyond winning and losing, the debate, to me, raises more questions than answers which calls for re-debate, or, once more, putting ‘Jabar on the dock – as it was. The Sheikh was, for instance, caught complaining that what was presented to the public by his debaters as his scholastic stand on the controversy was only a ‘text’ – with utter disregard to the context. In the name of fairness, could he be granted, in hindsight, the chance to hear him out through and through on the context? Or he just be asked to produce a book exhausting whatever burhan he has on this? Wouldn’t it be creditable if the classical Baytul Hikmah is reincarnated thus? To what extent is our toleration of dissent and dissidents in the name of freedom of opinion and expression thereof? Or are these concepts alien in our tradition? To what extent are the canons open to critique? What are the political and economic dimensions of these blasphemous shenanigans? And the international connections – how does it lubricate the engine of globalisation? Is it true that all the ahadith wherein the Prophet prescribed capital punishment were mere fabrication and distortions as the Sheikh lately claimed? Is the Sheikh alone in this, especially with regard to blasphemy? In the power asymmetry and contestation between the fringe and the mainstream, how do we save the truth from being the first casualty  – with apologies to Phillip Knight? Ad infinitum.

Bukar wrote in from ABU’s Mass Communication and can be reached via aabukar555@gmail.com.

Tags: BlasphemyCoalition of Kano UlamaKanoProphet Muhammad (SAW)Sheikh Abduljabbar Kabara
Previous Post

Mr President, are we fighting insecurity?

Next Post

Appreciating Alhaji Kabiru Tsoho

Next Post
Appreciating Alhaji Kabiru Tsoho

Appreciating Alhaji Kabiru Tsoho

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recommended

IPOB and the myth of the rising sun

Let there be Rice!

5 months ago
Reports alleging 1009 ex-Boko Haram fighters released false—Army

Nigerian Army fixes June 28 to July 11 for recruitment screening

2 weeks ago

Popular News

  • Christianization of Almajiris in Jos: the untold truth

    Christianization of Almajiris in Jos: the untold truth

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Before a Northern woman writes

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • 2023: Beyond unrealistic optimism

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0

Connect with us

Facebook Twitter
The Daily Reality

The Daily Reality

The Daily Reality is an online news medium with a physical address in Kano State, Nigeria. As our name suggests, we aim to be realistic and truthful to our readers. Moreover, we are an independent, non-partisan company. Thus, we will always do our best to be fair, factual and accurate in our journalism.

Follow us on social media

Category

  • Business (18)
  • Education (132)
  • Engausa (5)
  • Entertainment (18)
  • Health (21)
  • International (81)
  • Kannywood (18)
  • Lifestyle (23)
  • Literature (24)
  • Local (161)
  • National (145)
  • News (668)
  • Opinion (629)
  • Politics (136)
  • Religion (93)
  • Science (9)
  • Sports (17)
  • Technology (27)
  • Travel (4)
  • Uncategorized (3)
Court awards N1bn for blocking highway

Kano court convicts MTN, Glo, banks, others

29 June 2022
BREAKING: Dhul Hijjah crescent sighted in Saudi Arabia

BREAKING: Dhul Hijjah crescent sighted in Saudi Arabia

29 June 2022
Christianization of Almajiris in Jos: the untold truth

Christianization of Almajiris in Jos: the untold truth

29 June 2022

© 2022 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • News
  • Opinion
  • Politics
  • Business
  • National
  • Entertainment
  • International
    • Kannywood

© 2022 JNews - Premium WordPress news & magazine theme by Jegtheme.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In