FBI Court Filing Says Tinubu Was Subject of US Drug Trafficking Investigation

By Sabiu Abdullahi

A sworn declaration filed by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has acknowledged that Nigerian President Bola Ahmed Tinubu was the subject of a criminal investigation linked to drug trafficking in the early 1990s.

The declaration was submitted before the United States District Court for the District of Columbia on August 28, 2026, as part of a legal dispute over records requested under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

The document was obtained by Von Batten-Montague-York, a Washington-based lobbying firm engaged by former Nigerian Vice-President and African Democratic Congress presidential candidate Atiku Abubakar ahead of the 2027 presidential election.

The firm published portions of the document on X and said it had received a large volume of records from the FBI, which it was reviewing.

In its sworn declaration to the court, the FBI stated, “The responsive records herein were compiled in furtherance of the FBI’s investigation of multiple individuals for drug trafficking crimes.”

The agency also stated that “the court has already determined that an official acknowledgement had been made of an investigation of Bola Tinubu”.

The declaration was signed by an FBI official who serves as Acting Section Chief of the Record/Information Dissemination Section.

It concerns FOIA requests submitted by American transparency activist Aaron Greenspan, who sought records connected to the investigation.

Among the materials requested were the “entire FBI file for Bola Ahmed Tinubu, DOB 3/29/1952, President-Elect of Nigeria as of February 2023” and “FBI 302 interviews with Bola Tinubu from FBI Case No. 245-IP-71386-UUUUUU during the timeframe 1992-1993”.

Court Had Earlier Rejected FBI’s ‘Glomar’ Response

The latest declaration follows an April 2025 ruling by US District Judge Beryl Howell concerning requests for records held by the FBI and Drug Enforcement Administration.

The court ruled that the agencies could no longer use “Glomar” responses to refuse to confirm or deny the existence of records concerning the Tinubu investigation.

Judge Howell held that the agencies had not provided sufficient privacy grounds to keep secret the fact that Tinubu had been the subject of a criminal investigation.

The FBI’s latest filing explains why some of the requested records remain withheld under FOIA Exemptions 6, 7(C), 7(D), 7(E), and 7(F).

The exemptions cover areas such as personal privacy, confidential sources, law-enforcement procedures and information whose release could potentially endanger individuals.

Von Batten-Montague-Mork further stated in a post accompanying the document: “Update: We received a huge amount of records, which we are carefully going through and redacting where we see fit. Posted below are portions of the @FBI’s own sworn declaration submitted to the court on August 28, 2026.”

The firm added: “The FBI states under oath that the court has already determined that a criminal investigation of Nigerian President Bola Tinubu (@officialABAT) was officially acknowledged.

“Let that sink in: This is a sworn declaration submitted by the FBI to a United States federal court stating that Nigerian President Bola #Tinubu was criminally investigated in connection with the trafficking of #heroin.”

The lobbying firm also said: “We are posting this document to counter the claim made yesterday that President #Tinubu was never criminally investigated and is simply following the law to protect his privacy. That claim is false, as shown by the FBI’s sworn declaration below.”

FOIA Case Dates Back To 2022

The dispute arose from FOIA requests submitted by Greenspan between 2022 and 2023.

He requested records from six US federal agencies concerning a Chicago-based heroin trafficking operation that was active in the early 1990s.

The requests identified four individuals, including Tinubu, Lee Andrew Edwards, Mueez Adegboyega Akande and Abiodun Agbele.

The April 2025 ruling by Judge Howell formed part of the legal proceedings over the agencies’ handling of those requests.

The FBI’s latest declaration was submitted as the agency sought to justify continued withholding of portions of the records under federal disclosure exemptions.

The allegations and records concern events from the early 1990s. The court proceedings relate to access to government records under US law.