By Yakubu Nasiru Khalid
Formally, Izala sect was formed in 1978, it was created to eradicate innovation (bid’ah) within the Islamic doctrines. It has a modern structure and leadership both at the state and national levels. Therefore, the leadership of the Izala has come with well-structured and hierarchical bureau, and a feeling that they are different from who they see as “Conservative Islamic Groups”.
The structure comprises three arms; the Council of Ulama, the Administrative Council and The First Aid Group, each of the councils has its own head and followers for achieved designed goals, even with this structure, the sect experienced crisis at all levels which polarised its leadership.
The reason attached to the polarisation of Izala at the national level which later descended to many states were, among many others; the large followership, it may arguably be the largest formidable Islamic group in West Africa. Also, other reasons are multifaceted from jurisprudence, political, financial, external meddling and sundry, etc.
Initially, there was a problem regarding the leadership of the organization especially the question of who was the supreme leader of the organization between the administrative Council and the chairman of the Ulama Council. At the time the head of the Administrative Council was Alhaji Musa Muhammad Maigandu, from Kaduna and the Sheikh Ismail Idris, the Chairman of Ulama Council. The Jos Izala faction recognized Sheikh Ismail Idris.
Jos faction rejected Maigandu for not being a scholar but a businessman, they argued that an Islamic organization should be led by a scholar not a businessman, this added more fire to the crisis.
Furthermore, the Kaduna faction was very critical to some views and Fatwas of Sheikh Ismail Idris especially those that dealt with the issue of bid’a. According to Ismail Idris, the followers of Izalah should not pray behind an Imam who’s not a member of Izala, they should not also marry from the family of a person who is inclined to Sufism and should not eat the meat of an animal slaughtered by a follower of the Sufi groups. The Kaduna faction was vehemently against these views, and they opposed it.
Another vital factor that played a role in the split of Izala group was the accusations and counter-accusation of financial (mis)management. Ismail Idris was accused for dubiously representing the organization in the Arab countries, he was further accused of personalising vehicles donated to the Izala sect.
In addition, Ben Amara argued that the eruption of Gulf War in 1990s between USA and Iraq was another important factor in the polarisation of the Izala. Jos faction supported American invasion of Iraq because of the Saudi Arabian interest while the Kaduna faction supported Iraq. The Jos faction called the Kadunas “Saddamawa” meaning (supporters of Saddam) while the Kaduna called the Jos faction “Bushawa” meaning (supporters of American interest).
The leadership of the Jos faction blamed Shi’a for the internal crisis of Izala and accused some Ulamas of being secret agents of Shiism who were working toward dismantling the group.
There are so many wild accusations against each other and today, one of the greatest sad events are also unfolding which will serve as a litmus test over the major pathways which the Izala sect claims to have been following. There are series of arguments and counter arguments amongst its top ranking officials, some of whom are seeing by many onlookers as those who have completely drailed from the actual teachings of the Sunnah of the holy prophet (PBUH). Izalah leaders need retrospection and internal assessment to protect themselves and their creed from an obvious roadblock which may decide whether they move ahead successfully or crumble, devastatingly.
Yakubu can be reached via: yakubunasirukhalid@gmail.com