By Faruk Ak Waziri
Principles are the product of strong convictions and their ability to exert influence on what we do or don’t, how we react, and our behaviour in general. The principle is to a person what a container is to a liquid of a certain mass—like how the shape of water is dependent upon the shape of that which it is contained, a person’s action is often shaped according to their principles.
Principles are moral rules self-imposed upon oneself with the intention to live by them strictly. These rules, to the person following them, function as guides to a particular way of behaving or manner of doing things—they act as instructions as to what a person should consider appropriate or otherwise. One may refuse to entertain an idea, reach an agreement, or take part in an activity whose conditions and terms collide with their self-established moral values—their principles.
Does everyone have principles they follow?
As principles are rules or beliefs individually espoused, they vary between people, and not everyone has or follows them. A principled person is one who insists on behaving in a certain way, usually adhering to a fixed set of rules. An unprincipled person, on the other hand, is unscrupulous—they are fickle and dishonest, often without ethical standards.
Is it important for one to have principles they follow?
While many believe having principles is important, some believe that it is actually not—as to them, they are nothing but self-imposed restrictions that delude a person’s mind always to consider them when going about a previously encountered situation or thing. They believe principles enforce rigidity of approach where flexibility is a better suitor.
Yet despite the above opinion, principles are, however, seen by the majority as tools that facilitate the practice of right behaviour. Since they are formed to act as pillars of morality, principles help the person following them stay on track without deviating from doing what is right and good to what is considered bad and wrong. A person of principles tends to be more rational in choice and judgement than one who is not. As opined by Christopher Charles, “A man without principles is as a ship without a rudder—at the mercy of every wind and wave”
Is it okay to compromise one’s principles when convenient?
Compromising some of one’s principles in specific circumstances that necessitate doing so is okay, so long as that does not temper with the exercise of justice, honesty, fairness, equity, or integrity or done at the expense of any of the guiding values of life.
To emphasise the importance of having principles, Henri Frédéric Amiel, a nineteenth-century Swiss philosopher, critic, and poet, stated thus: “He who floats with the current, who does not guide himself according to higher principles, who has no idea, no convictions-such a man is a mere article of the world’s furniture-a thing moved, instead of a living and moving being-an echo, not a voice.”
Faruk Ak Waziri writes from Misau and can be reached via farukakwaziri019@gmail.com.